Conduct Disorder (CD) is a complex behavioral and emotional disorder that can occur in children and adolescents. According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), individuals with Conduct Disorder exhibit a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior in which the fundamental rights of others or central age-appropriate societal norms or rules are violated. These behaviors typically include aggression toward people or animals, destruction of property, deceitfulness or theft, and serious violations of rules (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2023).

Individuals presenting with Conduct Disorder may engage in physical fights, use weapons that could cause serious harm, display cruelty to animals or other people, or force someone into sexual activity. Destruction of property may manifest through deliberate fire-setting or the destruction of other's property. Deceitfulness is often seen through lying, breaking into someone else's house or car, or stealing items of nontrivial value without confronting a victim. Serious rules violations may include staying out at night despite parental prohibitions, running away from home overnight at least twice while living in the parental or parental surrogate home (or once without returning for a lengthy period), and truancy from school.

The presentation of Conduct Disorder varies considerably; some individuals may exhibit these behaviors in various settings, while others may show them primarily in one specific setting, such as at home, school, or with peers. The pattern of behavior often leads to significant impairment in social, academic, or occupational functioning. Furthermore, research suggests that individuals with Conduct Disorder may have difficulty processing social cues and may respond with aggression even when such cues are not meant to be threatening (Frick & Viding, 2009). The disorder has also been linked to other issues, such as substance abuse and co-occurring mental health conditions, including ADHD and depression (Moffitt, 2015).

It is crucial to note that the display of Conduct Disorder varies widely from person to person, and it is affected by a range of factors, including the individual's age, the presence of protective factors, and the social environment. Early intervention and treatment are essential for managing the disorder and potentially preventing the development of antisocial personality disorder in adulthood.

Diagnostic Criteria

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), outlines specific criteria for diagnosing Conduct Disorder (CD). These criteria are designed to encapsulate the severity and patterns of behavior that characterize the disorder. To be diagnosed with CD, an individual must display a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior in which they violate the rights of others or central age-appropriate societal norms or rules. This pattern includes at least three of the following criteria in the past 12 months, with at least one criterion present in the past six months:

• Aggression to People and Animals: This includes behaviors such as bullying, threatening, or intimidating others; initiating physical fights; using a weapon to cause serious physical harm to others; being physically cruel to people or animals; stealing while confronting a victim; and forcing someone into sexual activity.
• Destruction of Property: The individual may deliberately engage in fire-setting to cause severe damage or destroy others' property deliberately.
• Deceitfulness or Theft: These behaviors can include breaking into someone else's house, building, or car, lying to obtain goods or favors or to avoid obligations, and stealing items of nontrivial value without confronting a victim.
• Severe Violations of Rules: This includes staying out at night despite parental prohibitions, running away from home overnight at least twice or once without returning for a lengthy period, and truancy from school.

For a diagnosis, the disturbance in behavior must cause clinically significant impairment in social, educational, or occupational functioning. Additionally, if the individual is 18 years or older, the criteria for antisocial personality disorder must not be met.

In the DSM-5-TR, specifiers for Conduct Disorder provide additional detail about the nature of the disorder, which can help inform treatment strategies and give a clearer prognosis. Here are the specifiers for Conduct Disorder:

• With Limited Prosocial Emotions: This specifier is used if a child demonstrates at least two of the following characteristics persistently over 12 months in multiple relationships and settings: a lack of remorse or guilt, a callous lack of empathy, being unconcerned about performance, and shallow or deficient affect. This specifier indicates a more severe form of Conduct Disorder often associated with a worse prognosis.
• Childhood-Onset Type: This refers to individuals who show at least one symptom of Conduct Disorder prior to the age of 10. Children with this onset type are more likely to have persistent Conduct Disorder and to develop Antisocial Personality Disorder in adulthood.
• Adolescent-Onset Type: This is applied to individuals who do not show any symptoms of Conduct Disorder until after the age of 10. Generally, individuals with adolescent-onset are less likely to continue exhibiting antisocial behaviors into adulthood compared to those with childhood-onset.
• Unspecified Onset: This specifier is used when there is insufficient information to determine whether the onset of conduct problems occurred during childhood or adolescence.

These specifiers help clinicians and researchers to categorize and understand the variations in presentation and prognosis of Conduct Disorder, allowing for more tailored and effective treatment plans.

The DSM-5-TR also emphasizes that the expression of these behaviors should be considered about cultural, gender, and developmental differences. Clinical judgment is crucial, as some of the behaviors may not be indicative of a disorder depending on the context (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).

The DSM-5-TR criteria for CD are supported by a substantial body of research literature that details the presentation, course, and treatment implications of the disorder. Studies often highlight the disorder's significant overlap with other conditions, such as ADHD, the risk factors for its development, and its potential to evolve into antisocial personality disorder if left untreated (Frick et al., 2014).

The Impacts

Conduct Disorder (CD) is associated with a wide range of adverse impacts that affect not only the individual diagnosed with the disorder but also their families, peers, and society at large. The implications of CD can be long-term and pervasive, affecting multiple domains of functioning.

Children and adolescents with CD often experience significant impairment in social relationships. They tend to have higher rates of peer rejection and may struggle to form healthy relationships due to aggressive and deceitful behaviors (Frick & Viding, 2009). This social isolation can lead to an increased association with deviant peer groups, further entrenching antisocial behaviors (Moffitt et al., 2008).

In educational settings, youths with CD are at a higher risk for academic underachievement, truancy, and school dropout. Their behavior often leads to disciplinary actions, including suspensions and expulsions, which disrupt their educational trajectory and can limit their future vocational opportunities (Loeber et al., 2009).

The impacts of CD are not confined to childhood or adolescence; there are also significant implications for adulthood. Individuals with a history of CD are more likely to have encounters with the criminal justice system, including higher rates of arrest and incarceration. CD has been linked to the early onset of substance use disorders, which can further complicate the course of the disorder and reduce the likelihood of successful treatment outcomes (Odgers et al., 2008).

Furthermore, there is a notable economic impact due to the costs associated with health care, legal systems, and social services interventions. These immediate costs can accumulate over the lifespan due to ongoing difficulties adapting to normative social expectations (Scott et al., 2001).

Family functioning is often negatively impacted by the presence of CD. Parents and siblings of children with CD may experience increased stress, and there may be a higher incidence of family conflict and domestic violence. The disorder can also strain parental mental health, increasing the risk of depression and anxiety within the family unit (Frick et al., 2014).

Conduct Disorder has multifaceted impacts that underscore the importance of early identification and intervention to mitigate the far-reaching consequences of this disorder on the individual and society.

The Etiology (Origins and Causes)

The etiology of Conduct Disorder (CD) is considered multifactorial, involving a complex interplay of genetic, biological, environmental, and psychological factors. Genetic influences are suggested by familial patterns and twin studies, where heritability estimates for antisocial behavior range from moderate to high, indicating that genetic predispositions may play a significant role in the development of CD (Rhee & Waldman, 2002). Neurobiological research has identified potential differences in brain structure and function in individuals with CD, particularly in areas associated with aggression, impulse control, and emotion regulation (Fairchild et al., 2009).

Environmental factors are also critical in the etiology of CD. Children who experience adverse and harsh parenting and inconsistent discipline or who are victims of abuse and neglect have a higher risk of developing conduct problems (Patterson et al., 1989). Low socioeconomic status and exposure to violence or criminal behavior within the community are further environmental risk factors that can contribute to the development of CD (Moffitt, 2015).

Peer relationships exert a considerable influence as well. Associations with deviant peers can reinforce antisocial behavior and provide a context for learning and enacting such behavior (Dishion et al., 1999). Conversely, positive peer relationships and social support have been found to buffer against the development of conduct problems, highlighting the significance of the social environment.

Psychological factors, including cognitive and emotional aspects, are also implicated in CD. Difficulties in cognitive processing, such as interpreting social cues or problem-solving deficits, have been observed in those with CD, which may contribute to the manifestation of aggressive and antisocial behaviors (Frick & Morris, 2004). Additionally, emotional dysregulation, characterized by an inability to manage and respond to emotional experiences appropriately, is often seen in children and adolescents with CD (Beauchaine et al., 2007).

These causal factors do not act in isolation but interact in complex ways to increase the risk of CD. For instance, a child with a genetic predisposition to impulsivity may be more likely to develop CD if they also experience adverse environmental conditions such as parental neglect or peer rejection. Understanding these interactions is crucial for developing effective prevention and intervention strategies for CD.

Comorbidities

Conduct Disorder (CD) is frequently comorbid with a range of other psychiatric conditions, a fact that can complicate diagnosis and treatment. One of the most common comorbidities is Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Studies indicate that a substantial number of children and adolescents with CD also meet the criteria for ADHD, with symptoms of impulsivity and inattention possibly contributing to the severity and persistence of conduct problems (Angold et al., 1999).

Mood disorders, including depression and bipolar disorder, also occur at higher rates in individuals with CD. The irritability and aggression in CD can sometimes overlap with mood dysregulation, and conversely, mood disorders can exacerbate the negative affect and emotional dysregulation seen in CD (Nock et al., 2007).

Anxiety disorders are another frequent comorbidity, although the relationship between anxiety and CD is complex. Some research suggests that anxiety disorders may precede the development of conduct problems in some individuals, while in others, the disruptive behaviors associated with CD may contribute to the development of anxiety (Kendall et al., ... & Piacentini, 2010).

Substance use disorders are also commonly associated with CD. The risk-taking and impulsivity that characterize CD can lead to early experimentation and subsequent abuse of drugs and alcohol. Substance use can further entrench antisocial behavior and increase the risk of legal issues, as well as health-related consequences (Molina et al., 2012).

Learning disorders and academic challenges often co-occur with CD, with many affected individuals displaying significant impairments in academic achievement. These educational difficulties can further alienate individuals from the school environment, potentially reinforcing antisocial pathways (Maughan et al., 2004).

Moreover, the CD has been linked to personality disorders, particularly antisocial personality disorder in adulthood. The features of CD during childhood and adolescence, such as a lack of empathy and disregard for societal norms, can be precursors to the development of personality disorders if patterns of behavior persist (Robins, 1966).

Clinicians need to recognize and address these comorbidities when treating individuals with CD to ensure a comprehensive approach that addresses the full spectrum of an individual's needs.

Risk Factors

Risk factors for Conduct Disorder (CD) span various individual, familial, and socio-environmental influences. Individual risk factors include biological predispositions such as genetic vulnerabilities and temperamental characteristics like impulsivity or a problematic temperament (Lahey et al., 1999). Neurobiological factors, including prenatal exposure to toxins, perinatal complications, and head injuries, have also been associated with an increased risk of developing CD (Raine, 2002).

Family environment plays a critical role in the risk of CD. Children who are raised in families with high levels of conflict, poor parental supervision, harsh or inconsistent discipline, and a lack of warmth and involvement are more likely to develop conduct problems (Patterson et al., 1992). Parental psychopathology, including substance abuse and criminal behavior, is another significant risk factor that can contribute to the development of CD (Frick, 1998).

Socio-environmental factors such as poverty, exposure to violence, and association with delinquent peers have been robustly linked to the development of antisocial behaviors that characterize CD (Moffitt, 1993). Educational settings can also be influential; poor academic performance and adverse school environments, with a lack of reinforcement for positive behavior, are further risk factors (Capaldi & Stoolmiller, 1999).

It is important to note that these risk factors are often interrelated and cumulative. A child exposed to multiple risk factors, such as genetic predispositions, adverse family dynamics, and a hostile school environment, is at a significantly higher risk for developing CD than a child exposed to a single risk factor. Preventative interventions often target these risk factors, seeking to reduce their impact through family interventions, school-based programs, and community efforts to mitigate environmental risks.

Case Study

Background Information: Jackson, a 16-year-old male, was referred to a mental health clinic by his school counselor due to concerns about his aggressive behavior and violations of school rules. Jackson's teachers reported frequent fights with peers, bullying, particularly towards younger students, and defiance towards school authorities. His academic performance had declined significantly over the past year.

History: Jackson comes from a socioeconomically disadvantaged urban neighborhood. His parents divorced when he was eight, and his mother has been raising him and his two younger siblings. Jackson's mother works two jobs to support the family and is often absent at home. Jackson's father has a history of alcohol abuse and has been incarcerated multiple times for theft and assault.

Presenting Issues: Jackson has a history of temper tantrums from a young age, but his aggressive behavior became more pronounced during adolescence. He has been suspended from school multiple times for physical altercations and was once arrested for shoplifting. Recently, he assaulted a classmate, resulting in significant injury to the other student and legal charges against Jackson.

Assessment: Clinical interviews revealed that Jackson lacks remorse for his actions. He rationalizes his behavior as necessary for survival in his neighborhood. Standardized behavioral checklists completed by his mother and teachers confirmed patterns consistent with Conduct Disorder, characterized by aggression to people and animals, destruction of property, deceitfulness or theft, and serious violation of rules.

Intervention and Outcome: Jackson was placed in a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) program designed for adolescents with conduct problems. The therapy focused on improving problem-solving skills, moral reasoning, and anger management. Jackson's mother was also involved in family therapy sessions to strengthen parenting skills and create a more structured home environment.

Despite initial resistance, Jackson began to engage in the therapeutic process after establishing a solid rapport with his therapist. After several months, there was a noticeable reduction in his aggressive behavior. The legal charges were addressed in juvenile court, and Jackson was ordered to perform community service, which was integrated into his treatment plan as a learning experience.

Discussion: Jackson's case illustrates the complexities associated with Conduct Disorder. His background of family instability, exposure to a parent's criminal behavior, and lack of supervision contributed to his behavioral issues. The positive outcome in Jackson's case underscores the potential of targeted interventions, even with multiple risk factors. Continued support and monitoring were recommended to sustain the progress made in therapy and to address any further challenges Jackson might face during his transition into adulthood.

Recent Psychology Research Findings

Recent research in psychology has expanded our understanding of Conduct Disorder (CD), elucidating factors ranging from neurobiological underpinnings to intervention efficacy. One prominent area of study has been the neurobiological correlates of CD. Fairchild et al. (2019) investigated the structural brain abnormalities in adolescents diagnosed with CD. They found that these individuals often show reduced grey matter volume in areas associated with empathy and moral reasoning, such as the prefrontal cortex and temporal lobes. This suggests a potential neural basis for some of the characteristic behaviors of CD, like lack of remorse and difficulties in social cognition.

On the interventional front, some researchers have focused on the outcomes of therapy in youth with CD. A study by Caldwell, Skeem, Salekin, and Van Rybroek (2006) demonstrated that intensive, individualized therapeutic interventions could reduce aggressive behaviors in adolescents with CD over a two-year follow-up period. This study highlights the potential for rehabilitation even among youth with severe conduct problems, especially when interventions are tailored to the individual's needs.

Additionally, there is growing evidence that environmental factors play a significant role in the development and progression of CD. A longitudinal study by Waller et al. (2015) looked into the interplay between genetic influences and childhood maltreatment in predicting the course of CD. Their findings suggest that early maltreatment can have a lasting impact on behavioral trajectories, particularly for individuals with genetic predispositions to antisocial behavior.

Lastly, the effectiveness of preventive measures has also been a critical focus. Multi-systemic Therapy (MST), an intensive family- and community-based treatment, is effective in reducing long-term criminal behavior in youths with CD. A meta-analysis by Van der Stouwe et al. (2014) confirmed the effectiveness of MST, with results indicating significant improvements in behavior and lower recidivism rates.

Together, these studies contribute to a more nuanced understanding of CD, highlighting the importance of early, targeted, and individualized intervention strategies. They also consider biological and environmental factors when developing treatment and prevention programs.

Treatment and Interventions

The treatment and intervention for Conduct Disorder (CD) are multifaceted, involving a combination of therapeutic approaches tailored to the child's specific needs, family situation, and the severity of the symptoms. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is one of the most researched and utilized treatments for CD. CBT focuses on altering maladaptive thought patterns and behaviors, with interventions often including skills training, problem-solving, anger management, and social skills training (Kazdin, 2015). Evidence suggests that CBT can lead to significant improvements in behavior and is most effective when it involves parents and children together.

Parent Management Training (PMT) is another well-supported intervention designed to teach parents effective discipline techniques and positive reinforcement strategies. PMT programs like The Incredible Years and Triple P-Positive Parenting Program have been found to decrease aggressive and disruptive behaviors in children, as well as improve parental competence and family interactions (Webster-Stratton & Reid, 2018).

Multisystemic Therapy (MST) is an intensive family- and community-based treatment program for severe CD, particularly among adolescents. MST addresses the various systems that influence the child – home, school, and peers – and has shown effectiveness in reducing long-term rates of criminal behavior (Van der Stouwe, Asscher, Stams, Deković, & van der Laan, 2018).

In cases where comorbid conditions such as ADHD are present, pharmacological treatment may also be considered. Stimulant medication is commonly prescribed to manage symptoms of ADHD, which can indirectly reduce the symptoms of CD. However, the use of medication for CD is explicitly more controversial and typically not the first line of treatment unless other interventions have been unsuccessful (Connor, 2002).

It is important to note that the best outcomes are often achieved with a combination of these treatments, tailored to the individual needs of the child and their family. Early intervention is critical, as the behaviors associated with CD can become more resistant to change over time.

Implications if Untreated

If Conduct Disorder (CD) remains untreated, the implications can be profound and long-lasting, affecting numerous aspects of the individual's life and society. Research has shown that children and adolescents with untreated CD are at significant risk for a variety of adverse outcomes, including persistent antisocial behavior, substance abuse, and mental health issues like depression and anxiety (Frick et al., 2014). Furthermore, these individuals have a higher likelihood of academic failure, dropping out of school, and engaging in criminal activity, which often leads to incarceration (Moffitt et al., 2008).

Longitudinal studies suggest that untreated CD can evolve into Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD) in adulthood, a severe form of psychopathology associated with a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others (Robins & Price, 1991). The societal costs associated with untreated CD are also significant, including increased healthcare, legal, and social services expenses, as well as losses in productivity.

Moreover, the familial and social relationships of individuals with untreated CD are often strained, leading to further social isolation and exacerbation of symptoms (Patterson et al., 1992). The disruption to family life can also perpetuate a cycle of behavioral problems across generations, especially if the individual with CD becomes a parent.

These outcomes underscore the critical need for early identification and intervention for CD patients. Effective treatment can mitigate these risks and lead to more positive long-term outcomes for the individual and society.

Summary

Conduct Disorder (CD) presents significant challenges not only to those diagnosed with the disorder but also to their families, educators, and the wider community. Historically, individuals with CD were often viewed through a punitive lens, considered willfully disobedient, or morally flawed. Over time, however, there has been a shift towards a more nuanced understanding that recognizes the complex interplay of genetic, environmental, and neurodevelopmental factors contributing to the disorder (Moffitt, 2006). This has fostered a more compassionate and inclusive approach to diagnosis and treatment, aiming to understand and address the underlying causes of disruptive behaviors rather than simply punishing them.

The disorder's relationship disruption potential is profound. CD can significantly impair an individual's ability to form and maintain healthy relationships, leading to social isolation and conflict that can exacerbate the condition (Patterson et al., 1992). The persistent negative feedback from social interactions can undermine self-identity and confidence, leading to a self-fulfilling prophecy where expectations of antisocial behavior are both expected and met.

As our perspective on CD has evolved, there is now greater emphasis on early intervention, focusing on support and rehabilitation rather than solely on discipline. Society has come to recognize that individuals with CD, especially children and adolescents, can benefit from and have the capacity for positive change with the appropriate interventions (Kazdin, 2015).

In sum, while CD remains a challenging diagnosis, our evolving understanding of its complexities has led to more effective and empathetic approaches to treatment, aiming to restore the individual's potential for a fulfilling life and to heal the relationships disrupted by the disorder's symptoms.

References

Angold, A., Costello, E. J., & Erkanli, A. (1999). Comorbidity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40(1), 57-87.

Beauchaine, T. P., Gatzke-Kopp, L., & Mead, H. K. (2007). Polyvagal theory and developmental psychopathology: Emotion dysregulation and conduct problems from preschool to adolescence. Biological Psychology, 74(2), 174-184.

Caldwell, M. F., Skeem, J. L., Salekin, K. L., & Van Rybroek, G. J. (2006). Treatment response of adolescent offenders with psychopathy features: A 2-year follow-up. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33(5), 571-596.

Capaldi, D. M., & Stoolmiller, M. (1999). Co-occurrence of conduct problems and depressive symptoms in early adolescent boys: III. Prediction to young-adult adjustment. Development and Psychopathology, 11(1), 59-84.

Connor, D. F. (2002). Aggression and antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: Research and treatment. Guilford Press.

Dishion, T. J., Capaldi, D., Spracklen, K. M., & Li, F. (1995). Peer ecology of male adolescent drug use. Development and Psychopathology, 7(4), 803–824.

Fairchild, G., Hawes, D. J., Frick, P. J., Copeland, W. E., Odgers, C. L., Franke, B., ... & Viding, E. (2019). Conduct Disorder. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 5(1), Article 43.

Fairchild, G., van Goozen, S. H. M., Calder, A. J., Stollery, S. J., & Goodyer, I. M. (2009). Deficits in facial expression recognition in male adolescents with early-onset or adolescence-onset conduct disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(5), 627-636.

Frick, P. J. (1998). Conduct disorders and severe antisocial behavior. Plenum Press.

Frick, P. J., & Morris, A. S. (2004). Temperament and developmental pathways to conduct problems. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33(1), 54-68.

Frick, P. J., & Viding, E. (2009). Antisocial behavior from a developmental psychopathology perspective. Development and Psychopathology, 21(4), 1111-1131.

Frick, P. J., Ray, J. V., Thornton, L. C., & Kahn, R. E. (2014). Can callous-unemotional traits enhance the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of serious conduct problems in children and adolescents? A comprehensive review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 1-57.

Kazdin, A. E. (2015). Conduct disorders in childhood and adolescence. Sage publications.

Kendall, P. C., Compton, S. N., Walkup, J. T., Birmaher, B., Albano, A. M., Sherrill, J., ... & Piacentini, J. (2010). Clinical characteristics of anxiety disordered youth. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24(3), 360-365.

Lahey, B. B., Waldman, I. D., & McBurnett, K. (1999). The development of antisocial behavior: An integrative causal model. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40(5), 669-682.

Loeber, R., Burke, J. D., & Pardini, D. A. (2009). Development and etiology of disruptive and delinquent behavior. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 291-310.

Maughan, B., Rowe, R., Messer, J., Goodman, R., & Meltzer, H. (2004). Conduct disorder and oppositional defiant disorder in a national sample: developmental epidemiology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(3), 609-621.

Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674-701.

Moffitt, T. E. (2006). Life-course persistent versus adolescence-limited antisocial behavior. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Risk, disorder, and adaptation (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 570-598). Wiley.

Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Jaffee, S. R., Kim-Cohen, J., Koenen, K. C., Odgers, C. L., ... & Viding, E. (2008). Research review: DSM-V conduct disorder: research needs for an evidence base. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(1), 3-33.

Molina, B. S., Pelham, W. E. Jr, Cheong, J., Marshal, M. P., Gnagy, E. M., & Curran, P. J. (2012). Childhood ADHD and growth in adolescent alcohol use: The roles of functional impairments, ADHD symptom persistence, and parental knowledge. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(4), 922-935.

Nock, M. K., Kazdin, A. E., Hiripi, E., & Kessler, R. C. (2007). Lifetime prevalence, correlates, and persistence of oppositional defiant disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(7), 703-713.

Odgers, C. L., Moffitt, T. E., Broadbent, J. M., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., ... & Sears, M. R. (2008). Female and male antisocial trajectories: From childhood origins to adult outcomes. Development and Psychopathology, 20(2), 673-716.

Patterson, G. R., DeBaryshe, B. D., & Ramsey, E. (1989). A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. American Psychologist, 44(2), 329-335.

Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., & Dishion, T. J. (1992). A social learning approach: IV. Antisocial boys. Castalia Publishing Company.

Raine, A. (2002). Biosocial studies of antisocial and violent behavior in children and adults: A review. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30(4), 311-326.

Rhee, S. H., & Waldman, I. D. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin, 128(3), 490-529.

Robins, L. N. (1966). Deviant children grown up: A sociological and psychiatric study of sociopathic personality. Williams & Wilkins. 

Robins, L. N., & Price, R. K. (1991). Adult disorders predicted by childhood conduct problems: Results from the NIMH Epidemiologic Catchment Area project. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 54(2), 116–132.

Scott, S., Knapp, M., Henderson, J., & Maughan, B. (2001). Financial cost of social exclusion: Follow up study of antisocial children into adulthood. BMJ, 323(7306), 191.

Van der Stouwe, T., Asscher, J. J., Stams, G. J. J. M., Deković, M., & van der Laan, P. H. (2014). The effectiveness of multisystemic therapy (MST): A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(6), 105-116.

Waller, R., Hyde, L. W., Grabell, A. S., Alves, M. L., & Olson, S. L. (2015). Differential associations between childhood trauma subtypes and adolescent HPA-axis functioning. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 54, 103-114.

Webster-Stratton, C., & Reid, M. J. (2018). The Incredible Years parents, teachers, and children training series: A multifaceted treatment approach for young children with conduct problems. In J. R. Weisz & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents (pp. 122–141). The Guilford Press.