Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), formerly known as multiple personality disorder, is a complex psychological condition characterized by the presence of two or more distinct identity or personality states within a single individual (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013). Each identity state, commonly called "alters," presents a unique pattern of perceiving, relating to, and conceptualizing the environment and oneself. Transitions between these identities, known as "switching," can be rapid and spontaneous, often induced by stressors or particular environmental cues (Putnam, 1989). Notably, these alters can exhibit their distinct age, gender, history, and even varied skills and abilities (Loewenstein, 1991).

A defining characteristic of DID is the significant amnesia or memory gaps concerning everyday events, personal data, and activities, leading to circumstances where an individual may find themselves in unfamiliar places without recollection of their journey there or discover unfamiliar items in their possession (Brand et al., 2009). Though some alters may exist in a state of "co-consciousness" where they are simultaneously aware of ongoing experiences, DID is frequently associated with comorbid conditions such as depression, anxiety, self-harming behaviors, and suicidal ideation.

Most of those diagnosed with DID often have an underpinning history of trauma, especially early childhood maltreatment. However, the definitive relationship between trauma and the onset of DID remains an area of active investigation (Dalenberg et al., 2012). The portrayal of DID in media and popular culture, often sensationalized, has led to various misconceptions, underscoring the importance of a nuanced and informed understanding grounded in clinical research.

In pop culture, DID has been portrayed in various media and pop culture, often sensationalistically or inaccurately. This can contribute to misconceptions and misunderstandings about the disorder. However, it is essential to approach the topic with sensitivity and recognize that DID, like other psychological disorders, represents a complex interplay of biological, psychological, and environmental factors.

While DID is a recognized psychological disorder, it remains one of psychiatry's most debated and controversial diagnoses. Professionals may have varying opinions on its etiology, prevalence, and treatment.

Diagnostic Criteria

Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) is characterized by several specific diagnostic criteria as outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013). First and foremost, the individual must exhibit two or more distinct identity states or personalities. Each identity has its consistent way of perceiving, relating to, and thinking about the environment and oneself. These distinct identity states may have their names, histories, and characteristics (Spiegel et al., 2011). Second, there must be recurrent gaps in recalling everyday events, important personal information, and traumatic events that cannot be explained by ordinary forgetfulness (Brand et al., 2009). The individual may find themselves in places that have yet to remember how they arrived or discover unfamiliar objects or documents in their possession (Putnam, 1989). Another significant criterion for diagnosing DID is that the disturbance must cause considerable distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other essential areas of functioning (Loewenstein, 1991).

Furthermore, the disturbance is not a culturally accepted practice or norm, meaning it is not part of broadly recognized religious or cultural rituals (Ross, 1997). Lastly, in children, the symptoms should not be attributable to imaginary playmates or other fantasy play, differentiating the disorder from typical childhood behaviors (Kluft, 1985). The diagnosis of DID, while outlined in specific terms by the DSM-5, requires careful and comprehensive clinical assessment due to its complexity and the potential for misdiagnosis.

Here is a description focusing on the characteristics of the disorder and its presentation:

• Nature of the Disorder: DID, formerly known as multiple personality disorder, is characterized by two or more distinct identity or personality states within an individual. Each of these identities or "alters" has its enduring pattern of perceiving, relating to, and thinking about the environment and oneself.
• Switching Between Identities: People with DID may switch between these different identity states, and when one identity is in control, the person may forget events that occurred when another identity was in control. These switches can be sudden and may be triggered by various factors, such as stress or specific environmental cues.
• Presentation of Different Identities: Each alter or identity can have its name, age, gender, history, and characteristics. For example, one identity might be a young child, while another might be an adult of a different gender. They might also have different skills, talents, preferences, temperaments, and physical abilities. Some people with DID have reported having alters with different allergies or medical conditions.
• Amnesia: A hallmark feature of DID is the presence of amnesia or gaps in memory. This is not just about forgetting events from the distant past but can also involve not remembering day-to-day events, personal information, and activities. The person might find themselves in places without any memory of how they got there or find objects in their possession without any recollection of acquiring them.
• Coexistence of Identities: Different identities may sometimes coexist and communicate in what is described as "co-consciousness." This means that while one identity is in control, others might be aware of the ongoing experiences.
• Associated Features: Individuals with DID often experience comorbid symptoms, such as depression, anxiety, self-harm behaviors, and suicidal ideation. Many people with DID have a history of trauma, particularly early childhood abuse or neglect. However, the exact relationship between trauma and DID is a topic of ongoing research and debate.
• Functional Impairment: DID can significantly impair an individual's ability to function, mainly when there are frequent switches between identities or when specific identities engage in behavior that is incongruent with the individual's life. For instance, an identity that identifies as a child may emerge during an important work meeting, making it challenging for the individual to meet their professional responsibilities.

The Impacts

Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) can profoundly affect an individual's daily life, relationships, and overall well-being. Research has illuminated a range of adverse outcomes associated with this disorder. Functionally, those with DID often struggle with impaired social, occupational, and academic performance, mainly due to identity switches and memory gaps (Brand et al., 2009). The unpredictability of identity switches can lead to inconsistent behavior, which can strain interpersonal relationships and result in social isolation (Dorahy et al., 2014).

Comorbidities are also common, with many individuals diagnosed with DID experiencing symptoms of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, and borderline personality disorder, further compounding their challenges (Sar et al., 2016). Self-harming behaviors and suicidal ideation or attempts are also elevated among those with DID, underscoring the severe distress experienced by this population (Ross, 1997).

Furthermore, individuals with DID frequently report a history of trauma, especially childhood maltreatment, which can lead to heightened vulnerability to re-traumatization in adult life (Dalenberg et al., 2012). This vulnerability can manifest in various ways, from establishing abusive relationships to becoming victims of crime. Ultimately, the cumulative impact of DID significantly challenges an individual's quality of life and psychological well-being, necessitating comprehensive therapeutic interventions tailored to their unique needs (Brand & Loewenstein, 2010).

The Etiology (Origins and Causes)

The etiology of Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) is multifaceted, encompassing biological, psychological, and environmental factors. The most widely accepted hypothesis is the trauma model, which posits that DID arises primarily from early childhood traumatic experiences, especially recurrent physical, emotional, or sexual abuse (Putnam, 1989). According to this model, dissociation is initially employed as a coping mechanism, allowing the child to mentally "escape" from an unbearable situation. Over time, with continued exposure to trauma, these dissociative states can evolve and become more ingrained, forming distinct identity states or "alters" (Briere & Scott, 2014).

Much clinical and research evidence supports the association between childhood trauma and DID. Many individuals with DID report histories of severe childhood abuse or neglect (Dalenberg et al., 2012). However, it is essential to note that not everyone exposed to early trauma develops DID, suggesting that individual vulnerabilities, possibly genetic or neurobiological, play a role (Reinders et al., 2016).

Apart from the trauma model, the sociocognitive model of DID suggests that the disorder can arise from a combination of suggestibility, learned behavior, and specific cultural or therapeutic influences (Lynn et al., 2012). Proponents argue that some individuals might be more susceptible to possessing multiple identities due to certain therapeutic practices, media exposure, or other external influences. This perspective, however, is contentious and remains a minority viewpoint in the field.

There is also growing interest in the neurobiological underpinnings of DID. Studies have shown structural and functional differences in the brains of individuals with DID compared to those without the disorder (Schlumpf et al., 2013). These findings suggest that, while trauma plays a crucial role, there might also be inherent neurobiological factors predisposing specific individuals to DID or resulting from chronic dissociation.

In summary, while childhood trauma, particularly recurrent abuse, is a primary factor associated with the development of DID, a combination of individual vulnerabilities and potentially other environmental factors may also be involved. Understanding the precise etiology remains an area of active research and debate.

Comorbidities

Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) often does not occur in isolation. Many individuals with DID have one or more comorbid psychiatric disorders. Understanding these comorbidities is essential for a comprehensive clinical assessment and effective treatment planning.

• Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): Given the strong association between trauma and DID, it is not surprising that many individuals with DID also meet the criteria for PTSD. This condition arises from exposure to traumatic events. Symptoms like reliving the trauma characterize it, heightened arousal, avoidance of trauma-related stimuli, and negative alterations in mood and cognition (Brand et al., 2009).
• Major Depressive Disorder (MDD): Depression is common among individuals with DID. Symptoms might include persistent sadness, loss of interest in previously enjoyed activities, changes in appetite or sleep, and suicidal ideation (Dorahy et al., 2014).
• Anxiety Disorders: Various anxiety disorders, such as panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and social anxiety disorder, can coexist with DID (Ross, 1997).
• Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD): There is a noted overlap between DID and BPD, with some individuals meeting the diagnostic criteria for both. BPD is characterized by unstable relationships, self-image, and affects, as well as marked impulsivity (Sar et al., 2016).
• Somatoform Disorders are physical symptoms that a medical condition or substance cannot fully explain. The symptoms are not intentionally produced or feigned. Examples include somatic symptom disorder and conversion disorder (Loewenstein, 1991).
• Substance Use Disorders: Individuals with DID might resort to alcohol or drugs to cope with their distressing symptoms, leading to comorbid substance abuse or dependence (Brand et al., 2009).
• Eating Disorders: Conditions like anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge-eating disorder might also co-occur with DID, further complicating the clinical picture (Leserman et al., 1997).

Considering that these comorbidities can significantly impact the clinical presentation and treatment needs of individuals with DID is crucial. Thus, comprehensive assessments and integrated therapeutic approaches that address DID and its comorbid conditions are often essential for optimal outcomes.

Risk Factors

Risk factors for Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) encompass a combination of individual, environmental, and possibly biological precursors that increase the likelihood of the disorder's onset. The most well-documented and widely recognized risk factor for DID is a history of recurrent, severe childhood trauma, primarily physical, emotional, or sexual abuse (Putnam, 1989). Risk factors originating in childhood trauma, such as neglect, witnessing violence, or experiencing other adverse childhood events, can create an environment where dissociation serves as a coping mechanism, enabling a child to mentally detach from the traumatic experience (Briere & Scott, 2014). Over time and with repeated trauma, these dissociative states can solidify, forming distinct identity states (Chu et al., 1999).

Apart from direct trauma, the absence of a supportive or safe environment following trauma can also act as a risk factor. The lack of a protective caregiver to provide validation, safety, or emotional support after traumatic experiences can exacerbate the child's reliance on dissociation as a coping strategy (Dalenberg et al., 2012).

It is noteworthy that while trauma, especially in early life, is a primary risk factor, not everyone who experiences childhood trauma develops DID. This disparity suggests that individual differences, such as temperamental factors or genetic predispositions, might modulate the risk of developing DID in the presence of trauma (Reinders et al., 2016). Additionally, some research posits that certain cultural or therapeutic practices that emphasize or inadvertently encourage the idea of multiple identities can play a role, particularly in highly suggestible individuals (Lynn et al., 2012).

In conclusion, while childhood trauma is a primary risk factor for DID, a constellation of environmental, individual, and possibly biological factors can influence the disorder's onset and progression.

Case Study

Background: Kelvin, an African-American male aged 45, is a respected architect in his community and has been married for 20 years with two teenage children. Recently, he has been facing challenges at work, with colleagues noting periods of unexplained absenteeism and inconsistent behavior.

Presenting Problem: Kelvin sought help after a series of unsettling incidents. In one such incident, he missed a family gathering, and when questioned by his wife, he had no recollection of the planned event. He "awoke" in unfamiliar places several times without memorizing how he arrived there. His wife also reported episodes where Kelvin would exhibit unfamiliar mannerisms and refer to himself by a different name.

Assessment: During the initial consultations, Kelvin was hesitant but expressed concern about his "lost time" and the strain it was putting on his family and career. He seemed unaware of his alter personalities until, during one session, "Mike" emerged. Mike presented as a rebellious and defensive personality, markedly different from Kelvin's reserved demeanor. Mike spoke of events from Kelvin's childhood, hinting at past traumas that Kelvin himself had never disclosed.

In subsequent sessions, another identity, "Thomas," emerged. Thomas was more similar to Kelvin but was deeply sad, often speaking of regrets and missed opportunities.

History: With the emergence of these alters, a clearer picture of Kelvin's past began to unfold. He had a history of childhood trauma, with a physically abusive father and a mother who was emotionally distant. The trauma seemed to be the root cause of his DID, with Mike representing the rebellious and defensive side that Kelvin had to hide during his childhood and Thomas embodying his unprocessed emotions and regrets.

Treatment Plan: Kelvin was placed in an integrated treatment plan tailored to his DID. This included trauma-focused therapy, where he could process his childhood experiences and understand the origins of his alters. Cognitive-behavioral strategies were also employed to help Kelvin and his alters develop better communication and co-consciousness. Family therapy was recommended to help his wife and children understand and navigate the complexities of DID.

Outcome: With consistent therapy, Kelvin reported fewer episodes of lost time over time. He began journaling daily to communicate with his alters, allowing for a more harmonious coexistence. His work life stabilized, and his family became more understanding and supportive, which was crucial in his ongoing recovery.

Recent Psychology Research Findings

Recent research on Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) has shed light on various aspects of the disorder, including its neurobiological underpinnings, treatment modalities, and symptom manifestations.

Advances in neuroimaging techniques have provided a more detailed understanding of DID's neurological aspects. Recent studies have identified distinct brain activity patterns associated with different identity states and pinpointed variations in structural brain regions, including areas linked to memory and emotion regulation. Such discoveries provide a biological basis that counters previous skepticism regarding DID's legitimacy. The findings emphasize that DID is not merely a product of suggestion or role-playing but has concrete neurobiological manifestations (Schlumpf et al., 2013).

Historically, DID's portrayal in media has popularized the dramatic switching of overt identity states. However, the clinical reality is often more nuanced. Many individuals with DID might not exhibit overt shifts in identity that are readily observable. Instead, the transitions can be subtle, with alters communicating internally, resulting in feelings of "zoning out" or losing time rather than dramatic behavioral shifts. This internal manifestation makes diagnosis challenging and underscores the importance of clinicians being adept and sensitive in recognizing these less apparent symptoms (Brand & Loewenstein, 2010).

The integral link between DID and trauma, especially childhood trauma, necessitates therapeutic approaches addressing these traumatic origins. Interventions such as EMDR involve a structured eight-phase approach to process traumatic memories, transforming their emotional charge. Trauma-informed CBT, on the other hand, adapts traditional cognitive-behavioral techniques to consider trauma survivors' unique needs and experiences, ensuring therapy is sensitive and does not retraumatize the individual (Cloitre et al., 2011).

The expression and experience of DID can be influenced by cultural factors. For instance, certain cultures might interpret the presence of multiple identities as spiritual or supernatural phenomena, potentially influencing how individuals understand and relate to their experiences. Cultural beliefs about the acceptability of expressing trauma or distress can also shape the manifestation and disclosure of DID symptoms. As such, culturally informed assessments and treatments are crucial to addressing the disorder effectively across diverse populations (Jepsen et al., 2014).

As research progresses, it continually emphasizes the interplay of neurobiological, psychological, and cultural factors in shaping the disorder.

Treatment and Interventions

Treating Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) is a complex process that requires a comprehensive, tailored approach. Given the profound impact of trauma in most DID cases, interventions often focus on addressing trauma, enhancing the integration of identity states, and improving overall functioning.

Psychotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for individuals with DID. The therapy is often long-term and aims to promote co-consciousness, where all identity states know each other's actions and thoughts. For some, the goal is fusion, where the distinct identities integrate into one cohesive identity. Psychotherapy focuses on stabilizing the patient, ensuring safety, and building a strong therapeutic alliance. This foundational work is critical before delving into deeper trauma to minimize re-traumatization risk (Brand et al., 2009).

An essential component of psychotherapy for DID is trauma-focused therapy. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is often used to challenge and rectify cognitive distortions, enhance emotional regulation, and develop effective coping strategies. Another practical approach is Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), designed by Shapiro (2001). In EMDR, individuals process traumatic memories through structured and guided eye movements, which can help integrate these traumatic experiences. Exposure Therapy, a form of CBT, may also be employed, allowing patients to confront and re-experience traumatic events in a controlled therapeutic setting, thereby reducing the emotional charge associated with the memories.

Clinical Hypnosis has shown efficacy in treating DID, particularly facilitating communication between identity states and accessing traumatic memories. It decreases amnesic barriers and can help the integration process (Loewenstein, 1991).

Medications are not used to treat DID directly but can address comorbid conditions. Medication like antidepressants can be beneficial for associated depressive symptoms. Anxiolytics can help manage anxiety symptoms, while mood stabilizers might be used to address mood fluctuations.

Group Therapy provides a supportive environment where individuals can share experiences, gain insights, and reduce feelings of isolation. The group setting fosters mutual support and understanding among individuals experiencing similar challenges (Dell & Eisenhower, 1990).

Family Therapy is paramount in cases where the family is involved in the patient's life. DID does not only impact the individual but also affects their relationships. Educating the family about DID, enhancing communication, and equipping them with coping strategies can be instrumental in the patient's healing journey.

Art or Movement Therapies offer an avenue for non-verbal exploration and expression for those who struggle with verbal expression or need alternative means to process trauma. These therapeutic modalities can help individuals access and express emotions that might be challenging to articulate.

In severe cases, mainly where there is a risk of self-harm or harm to others, Inpatient Treatment can be invaluable. Such settings offer intensive therapy, a structured environment, and continuous monitoring, ensuring the individual's safety and facilitating stabilization.

Treating DID requires a multifaceted, individualized approach. Success hinges on building a strong therapeutic relationship, ensuring patient safety, and utilizing a combination of therapeutic modalities tailored to the patient's unique needs. Successful treatment of DID often requires a combination of these therapies tailored to an individual's unique needs. The overarching goal is to improve the individual's quality of life, achieve integration or harmonious functioning of identity states, and process and cope with past traumas.

Implications if Untreated

If Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) is left untreated, the individual and their surrounding community can face many challenges and adverse outcomes. Here is a detailed exploration of the implications of untreated DID:

• Severe Functional Impairment: Individuals with untreated DID might experience significant disruptions in their daily activities. They might struggle with maintaining consistent employment, managing daily responsibilities, and maintaining social relationships. The unpredictability of identity switches can lead to inconsistent behaviors and challenges in sustaining routines (Brand et al., 2009).
• Relationship Strains: Due to frequent switches between identities and the accompanying memory gaps, individuals with DID may find it challenging to sustain stable and healthy personal relationships. Partners, family members, and friends may find navigating the changing dynamics challenging and coping with the individual's unpredictable behavior (Dorahy et al., 2014).
• Increased Self-Harm and Suicidality: Untreated DID is associated with an elevated risk of self-injurious behaviors and suicidal ideation or attempts. Internal distress, challenges in emotion regulation, and traumatic memories can push individuals toward harming themselves (Ross, 1997).
• Vulnerability to Re-traumatization: Individuals with DID often have a history of trauma, and without appropriate therapeutic interventions, they remain at heightened risk for further victimization or entering into abusive situations in adulthood (Dalenberg et al., 2012).
• Comorbid Mental Health Disorders: When DID remain untreated, there is a likelihood that comorbid conditions such as depression, anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, and substance use disorders can exacerbate or become more entrenched, leading to a more complex clinical picture (Sar et al., 2016).
• Economic and Social Costs: The functional impairments associated with untreated DID can lead to economic challenges, including loss of employment, reliance on disability benefits, or homelessness. This not only impacts the individual but can also have broader societal implications.
• Health Challenges: Chronic stress and mental distress have been associated with various physical health problems. Individuals with untreated DID might face increased health risks, ranging from chronic pain conditions to cardiovascular problems.
• Legal and Forensic Implications: In some cases, actions taken by one identity might have legal consequences that impact the individual's life, especially if they do not remember the event or if their actions were inconsistent with their typical behavior.

In conclusion, untreated DID can lead to significant personal, relational, and societal challenges. Early identification and intervention are crucial to mitigate these adverse outcomes and improve the quality of life for individuals with DID.

Summary

Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) has long been controversial and debated within psychology. Historically, there has been skepticism about its legitimacy, with some professionals questioning whether the disorder was a genuine mental health condition or a product of suggestibility, either induced by therapists or external influences like media (Lynn et al., 2012). Critics have often pointed to the sociocognitive model, which suggests that DID might arise from a combination of learned behavior, therapeutic suggestions, and certain cultural influences. Additionally, the dramatic increase in diagnosed cases during the late 20th century, alongside the depiction of DID in popular media, further fueled skepticism (Piper & Merskey, 2004).

However, the past few decades have seen significant shifts in the understanding and acceptance of DID. A growing body of research now highlights the neurobiological underpinnings and distinct brain activity patterns associated with different identity states, bolstering the argument for its legitimacy (Reinders et al., 2016). The trauma model, which posits that DID primarily results from early, recurrent traumatic experiences, especially severe childhood abuse, has gained substantial empirical support (Dalenberg et al., 2012).

Today, while debates and skepticism persist to some degree, there is a broader acceptance of DID within the clinical community. Including DID in recognized diagnostic manuals like the DSM-5 underscores its status as a valid and recognized disorder. As research continues, it is hoped that further insights will be gained into the complexities of DID, ensuring that affected individuals receive appropriate and evidence-based care.

References

Brand, B. L., & Loewenstein, R. J. (2010). Dissociative disorders: An overview of assessment, phenomenology, and treatment. Psychiatric Times, 27(10), 62-69.

Brand, B. L., Classen, C. C., Lanins, R., Loewenstein, R. J., McNary, S. W., Pain, C., & Putnam, F. W. (2009). A naturalistic study of dissociative identity disorder and dissociative disorder not otherwise specified patients treated by community clinicians. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 1(2), 153–171.

Briere, J., & Scott, C. (2014). Principles of trauma therapy: A guide to symptoms, evaluation, and treatment. Sage Publications.

Chu, J. A., Frey, L. M., Ganzel, B. L., & Matthews, J. A. (1999). Memories of childhood abuse: Dissociation, amnesia, and corroboration. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 156(5), 749-755.

Dalenberg, C. J., Brand, B. L., Gleaves, D. H., Dorahy, M. J., Loewenstein, R. J., Cardena, E., ... & Spiegel, D. (2012). Evaluation of the evidence for the trauma and fantasy models of dissociation. Psychological Bulletin, 138(3), 550–588.

Dell, P. F., & Eisenhower, J. W. (1990). Adolescent multiple personality disorder: A preliminary study of eleven cases. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 29(3), 359-366.

Dorahy, M. J., Brand, B. L., Şar, V., Krüger, C., Stavropoulos, P., Martínez-Taboas, A., ... & Middleton, W. (2014). Dissociative identity disorder: An empirical overview. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 48(5), 402–417.

Kluft, R. P. (1985). Childhood antecedents of multiple personality disorder. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 8(1), 7–14.

Leserman, J., Drossman, D. A., & Li, Z. (1997). The reliability and validity of a sexual and physical abuse history questionnaire in female patients with gastrointestinal disorders. Behavioral Medicine, 23(3), 131–137.

Loewenstein, R. J. (1991). An office mental status examination for complex chronic dissociative symptoms and multiple personality disorder. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 14(3), 567–604.

Lynn, S. J., Lilienfeld, S. O., Merckelbach, H., Giesbrecht, T., & van der Kloet, D. (2012). Dissociation and dissociative disorders: Challenging conventional wisdom. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 48–53.

Lynn, S. J., Lilienfeld, S. O., Merckelbach, H., Giesbrecht, T., & van der Kloet, D. (2012). Dissociation and dissociative disorders: Challenging conventional wisdom. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 48–53.

Piper, A., & Merskey, H. (2004). The persistence of folly: A critical examination of dissociative identity disorder. Part I. The excesses of an improbable concept. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 49(9), 592-600.

Putnam, F. W. (1989). Diagnosis and treatment of multiple personality disorder. Guilford Press.

Reinders, A. A., Willemsen, A. T., Vos, H. P., Boer, J. A., & Nijenhuis, E. R. (2016). Opposite brain emotion-regulation patterns in identity states of dissociative identity disorder: A PET study and neurobiological model. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 251, 25–32.

Ross, C. A. (1997). Dissociative identity disorder: Diagnosis, clinical features, and treatment of multiple personality. Wiley.

Sar, V., Akyüz, G., Doğan, O., & Oztürk, E. (2016). The prevalence of conversion symptoms in women from a general Turkish population. Psychosomatic Medicine, 68(5), 769–777.

Schlumpf, Y. R., Nijenhuis, E. R., Chalavi, S., Weder, E. V., Zimmermann, R., Luechinger, R., ... & Jäncke, L. (2013). Dissociative part-dependent biopsychosocial reactions to backward masked angry and neutral faces: An fMRI study of dissociative identity disorder. NeuroImage: Clinical, 3, 54–64.

Shapiro, F. (2001). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR): Basic principles, protocols, and procedures (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Spiegel, D., Loewenstein, R. J., Lewis-Fernández, R., Sar, V., Simeon, D., Vermetten, E., ... & Dell, P. (2011). Dissociative disorders in DSM-5. Depression and Anxiety, 28(9), 824–852.