Communication disorders encompass a range of difficulties related to speech, language, and communication. These disorders can manifest in various ways, often influencing an individual's communicative abilities and psychosocial well-being. The DSM-5 defines communication disorders as significant language, speech, and communication difficulties. Here are the primary communication disorders listed in the DSM-5:

• Language Disordersare persistent difficulties in acquiring and using language across modalities (such as spoken, written, sign language) because of deficits in comprehension or production. This might include limited vocabulary, sentence structure, and impairments in discourse.
• Speech Sound Disorders Persistent(previously Phonological Disorder) difficulty with speech sound production that interferes with speech intelligibility or prevents verbal communication of messages.
• Childhood-Onset Fluency Disorders (Stuttering)substantially disrupt the rhythm and timing of speech, typically characterized by frequent repetitions or prolongations of sounds or syllables. Physical signs of distress or avoidance behaviors may accompany this.
• Social (Pragmatic) Communication Disorderare persistent difficulties in the social use of verbal and nonverbal communication. This encompasses problems in understanding and following social rules of verbal and nonverbal communication in everyday social settings, changing communication to match the context, following directions for storytelling or conversation, and understanding non-literal or ambiguous language meanings.
• Unspecified Communication Disorders are applied in situations where symptoms characteristic of a communication disorder cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning but do not meet the full criteria for any specific disorders.

Other disorders in the DSM-5, such as Autism Spectrum Disorder, may also feature communication challenges, but they are diagnosed based on a broader range of symptoms. Language disorder in Autism is characterized by difficulties in understanding or using words in context, both verbally and nonverbally. These individuals might grapple with understanding complex sentences, possess a limited vocabulary, face challenges in forming sentences, or experience difficulties actively participating in conversations. The repercussions of such challenges are not limited to mere communication. Research has demonstrated that struggles with language can impair academic performance, stymie social interactions, and erode self-esteem. As a consequence, individuals with language disorders often confront feelings of frustration, embarrassment, and, in some cases, social isolation. This is supported by a study by Conti-Ramsden & Durkin (2016), which revealed the broader psychosocial implications of language disorders.

Diagnostic Criteria

In the DSM-5, communication disorders encompass several specific disorders, each with its own diagnostic criteria. Here's a summarized version of the diagnostic criteria for the primary communication disorders:

Language Disorder:

• Persistent difficulties in the acquisition and use of language across modalities (e.g., spoken, written, sign language) due to deficits in comprehension or production.
• The language abilities are below age expectations, resulting in functional limitations in effective communication, social participation, academic achievement, or occupational performance.
• The onset of symptoms is in the early developmental period.
• The difficulties are not attributable to hearing or other sensory impairment, motor dysfunction, or another medical or neurological condition and are not better explained by intellectual disability or global developmental dela

Speech Sound Disorder:

• Persistent difficulty with speech sound production that interferes with speech intelligibility or prevents verbal communication of messages.
• The disturbance causes limitations in effective communication that interfere with social participation, academic achievement, or occupational performance.
• The onset of symptoms is in the early developmental period.
• The difficulties cannot be attributed to congenital or acquired conditions such as cerebral palsy, cleft palate, deafness or hearing loss, or traumatic brain injury.

Childhood-Onset Fluency Disorder (Stuttering):

• Disturbances in normal fluency and time patterning of speech that are inappropriate for the individual's age and language skills.
• The disturbance causes anxiety about speaking or limitations in effective communication, social participation, academic achievement, or occupational performance.
• The onset of symptoms is in the early developmental period.
• The disturbance is not attributable to another medical condition and is not better explained by another mental disorder.

Social (Pragmatic) Communication Disorder:

• Persistent difficulties in the social use of verbal and nonverbal communication as manifested by all of the following: a. Deficits in using communication for social purposes. b. Impairment in the ability to change communication to match the context or needs of the listener. c. Difficulties following rules for conversation and storytelling. d. Difficulties understanding implicit or non-literal meanings of language.
• The resulting communication deficits result in functional limitations in effective communication, social participation, relationships, academic achievement, or occupational performance.
• The onset of symptoms is in the early developmental period.
• The symptoms are not attributable to another medical or neurological condition or to low abilities in the domains of word structure and grammar.

Unspecified Communication Disorder:

• This category is for communication difficulties that do not meet the criteria for any specific communication disorder but still cause significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.

Identifying and diagnosing Communication Disorders poses several challenges. One significant factor is the inherent variability in developmental milestones. Particularly in children, the pace at which they reach these milestones can differ widely. While some might initiate speech later than their peers, they may eventually catch up without any interventions, making it difficult to determine whether there's a genuine problem or just a natural variation in development. Additionally, the presence of coexisting conditions, such as hearing impairments, ADHD, or Autism Spectrum Disorder, can complicate the diagnostic picture. Symptoms of these disorders can overlap with or mask the signs of Communication Disorders.

Cultural and linguistic diversity also introduce diagnostic challenges. Some behaviors might be misconstrued as symptoms of a disorder when they are, in fact, manifestations of cultural norms or bilingual language acquisition. Furthermore, the inherent subjectivity in evaluating communication skills can lead to inconsistencies in diagnosis. For instance, what one clinician might view as a communication deficit, another might perceive as a minor developmental lag. These factors, combined with others such as limited access to specialized professionals or lack of awareness about these disorders, contribute to the complexities of identification and diagnosis.

The Impacts

Communication Disorders can have profound effects on an individual's overall well-being, academic or occupational success, and social interactions. The impacts extend beyond just the ability to communicate effectively and can permeate various aspects of life. Drawing from the psychology literature, here's what research has uncovered about these effects:

Social Challenges: Individuals with Communication Disorders often encounter difficulties in forming and maintaining social relationships. Such challenges can result in feelings of isolation, reduced social participation, and increased vulnerability to bullying or social victimization (Redmond, 2011).

Academic Difficulties: Language is foundational to learning. Children with Communication Disorders can struggle with reading comprehension, written expression, and overall academic achievement, often resulting in lower grades and increased risk of dropping out (Catts, Fey, Tomblin, & Zhang, 2002).

Emotional and Behavioral Impacts: Communication Disorders can contribute to reduced self-esteem, increased frustration, and feelings of embarrassment. In some cases, these challenges may lead to behavioral problems or symptoms of anxiety and depression (Beitchman et al., 2001).

Occupational Limitations: For adults, Communication Disorders can limit career opportunities and affect job performance, particularly in professions demanding effective communication skills (Johnson et al., 1999).

Overall Quality of Life: Beyond the educational, social, and occupational spheres, Communication Disorders can influence an individual's overall quality of life. Such impacts encompass participation in community activities, interpersonal relationships, and general life satisfaction (Howe, 2008).

Children with Communication Disorders often face increased vulnerability to bullying and teasing due to their perceived differences. Navigating these challenges requires specific strategies tailored to their unique needs. Based on psychological research, parents and children with Communication Disorders can employ the following strategies to handle and reduce the impacts of negative peer interactions:

Parents play a pivotal role by fostering an open communication environment, even when their child faces challenges in expressing themselves. Encouraging alternative modes of communication, such as drawings or storyboards, can help children relay their school experiences and feelings (Stevens, 2002). Proactive collaboration with school professionals is also essential. Regular meetings with teachers and school counselors can ensure that they are aware of the child's disorder, the potential for bullying, and the need for classroom interventions (Conti-Ramsden & Botting, 2004).

Equipping children with social skills training can be particularly beneficial. Through this, children learn to recognize, interpret, and appropriately respond to social cues, thereby enhancing their peer interactions and potentially mitigating instances of teasing or bullying (Kavale & Mostert, 2004). Peer mentoring programs can also be advantageous, where children are paired with understanding classmates who support them during social interactions (Swearer et al., 2010).

Finally, psychoeducation within schools plays a vital role. By educating peers about Communication Disorders and the importance of inclusion and acceptance, the environment can become less conducive to bullying and more understanding of diversity (Bishop, 2014).

The Etiology (Origins and Causes)

The etiology of Communication Disorders has multiple contriuting causes, stemming from a combination of genetic, neurological, environmental, and cognitive factors. Research has delved deep into understanding these origins and causes.

Genetic factors play a crucial role. Studies have identified familial patterns in many Communication Disorders, suggesting a hereditary component (Stromswold, 1998). Some specific genes have been implicated in language and speech disorders, indicating a biological basis for these conditions (Newbury & Monaco, 2010).

Neurological factors are also significant contributors. Abnormalities in brain structures or functions related to language processing and production can be present in individuals with Communication Disorders. For instance, research has shown differences in the brain's left hemisphere, which is vital for language processing, in children with language disorders (Gaab, Gabrieli, & Glover, 2007).

Environmental influences can't be ignored either. For instance, children exposed to impoverished linguistic environments or those who have experienced neglect or trauma might display delayed or disordered language development (Hart & Risley, 1995).

Lastly, cognitive factors play a role as well. Cognitive processing deficits, especially in phonological processing, have been linked to speech and language disorders (Joanisse, Manis, Keating, & Seidenberg, 2000).

Genetic Factors:

• Heritability: Studies involving twins and families have consistently highlighted the role of genetics in Communication Disorders. For instance, speech and language impairments are more likely to be observed in identical twins than in fraternal twins (Bishop, 2002).
• Specific Genes: Advances in genetic research have pointed to specific genes associated with speech and language. One notable example is the FOXP2 gene, which when mutated, has been linked to difficulties in sequencing the precise mouth and face movements required for speech (Lai, Fisher, Hurst, Vargha-Khadem, & Monaco, 2001).

Neurological Factors:

• Brain Structures and Functions: Research using neuroimaging techniques, such as fMRI, has found differences in the structure, connectivity, and activation of specific brain regions, especially those in the left hemisphere, in individuals with language disorders compared to typically developing peers (Gaab, Gabrieli, & Glover, 2007).
• Neurotransmitter Imbalance: Some studies have suggested that imbalances in certain neurotransmitters can be linked to communication impairments. For instance, serotonin imbalances have been associated with stuttering (Alm, 2004).

Environmental Factors:

• Language Exposure: A landmark study by Hart and Risley (1995) found that children from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds heard millions fewer words by age 3 than their more advantaged peers, which can contribute to language delays.
• Trauma and Neglect: Children who've experienced trauma or neglect can exhibit language delays or disorders. The absence of stimulating environments or significant emotional trauma can hamper language development (Nelson III, Fox, & Zeanah, 2014).

Cognitive Factors:

• Phonological Processing: Difficulties in processing sounds, known as phonological processing deficits, have been observed in individuals with speech and language disorders. This deficit impacts the ability to differentiate and reproduce the intricate sounds in words (Joanisse, Manis, Keating, & Seidenberg, 2000).
• Working Memory: Working memory, the ability to hold and manipulate information over short periods, has been linked to language processing. Deficits in working memory can contribute to challenges in understanding and producing complex sentences (Gathercole & Baddeley, 1990).

Comorbidities

Communication Disorders often do not occur in isolation and can coexist with other conditions, a phenomenon known as comorbidity. Understanding these comorbidities provides a more comprehensive picture of an individual's challenges and aids in targeted intervention.

One of the most recognized comorbidities is Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Children with Communication Disorders, especially Language Disorders, frequently exhibit symptoms of ADHD, such as inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity (Redmond & Ash, 2014). This overlap can sometimes make the differential diagnosis a challenge.

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is another condition frequently comorbid with Communication Disorders. Individuals with ASD often experience difficulties with social communication, which may overlap with or exacerbate symptoms of Communication Disorders (Tager-Flusberg & Kasari, 2013).

Learning Disorders, such as dyslexia, often co-occur with Communication Disorders. For example, a child with a phonological disorder may also have trouble with reading and writing, given the interconnectedness of these skills (Catts, Adlof, Hogan, & Weismer, 2005).

Furthermore, emotional and behavioral problems can arise as secondary comorbidities. For instance, children with Communication Disorders may experience increased levels of anxiety, lower self-esteem, or depressive symptoms due to their communication challenges, leading to social isolation or academic difficulties (Beitchman et al., 2001).

Risk Factors

Communication Disorder risk factors, supported by the psychological literature are:

• Family History: Genetics can play a significant role. Having family members, especially immediate relatives, with Communication Disorders can increase the risk of a child developing similar difficulties (Stromswold, 1998).
• Prenatal and Perinatal Complications: Factors like premature birth, low birth weight, and maternal drug or alcohol use during pregnancy can elevate the risk of Communication Disorders in the offspring (Aarnoudse-Moens, Weisglas-Kuperus, van Goudoever, & Oosterlaan, 2009).
• Neurological Disorders: Conditions such as traumatic brain injury, cerebral palsy, or epilepsy can lead to communication challenges (Vargha-Khadem et al., 1997).
• Persistent Ear Infections: Recurring ear infections in early childhood can lead to hearing loss, which in turn might delay language acquisition (Roberts, Burchinal, & Durham, 1999).
• Exposure to Multiple Languages: While bilingualism itself isn't a risk factor, children exposed to multiple languages without sufficient support or consistency might experience temporary delays in language milestones (Paradis, Genesee, & Crago, 2011).
• Socioeconomic Factors: Children from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds may have limited access to language-rich environments, potentially leading to language delays (Hart & Risley, 1995).
• Neglect or Abuse: Childhood trauma, neglect, or abuse can have profound impacts on various developmental domains, including communication (Nelson III, Fox, & Zeanah, 2014).

Case Study

Background Information:

Emily is a 7-year-old girl currently in the second grade. She lives with her parents and her younger brother, Jack, who is 4 years old. Emily's parents began noticing differences in her speech and language development around the age of 3, especially when comparing her to other children her age and recalling Jack's development at the same age.

Presenting Problem:

Emily often struggles to find the right words when speaking, leading to pauses in her conversations. She also displays difficulty in understanding complex sentences and often asks for repetition or clarification. Her peers have noticed these challenges, and as a result, Emily is sometimes excluded from group activities and playdates. She recently started to show signs of frustration, especially when trying to express her thoughts and feelings.

History:

• Birth and Early Development: Emily was born full-term without any complications. Her early milestones, such as crawling, walking, and initial babbling, were within typical ranges.
• Medical: Emily had recurrent ear infections between the ages of 1 and 3.
• Family: Both parents are proficient English speakers without any known history of Communication Disorders. However, Emily's maternal grandmother had a late-onset hearing impairment.

Assessment:

Emily underwent a comprehensive speech and language assessment. Key findings included:

• A significant discrepancy between her receptive (understanding) and expressive (speaking) language skills, with expressive skills being notably weaker.
• Difficulty in constructing complex sentences and often reverted to simpler syntactic structures.
• Phonological awareness skills, crucial for reading and writing, were below the expected level for her age.

Intervention:

Emily started attending speech and language therapy sessions twice a week. The therapist focused on enhancing her expressive language skills, expanding her vocabulary, and improving her phonological awareness to support her academic skills.

The school was also involved: Emily received additional support in the classroom, including preferential seating to reduce auditory distractions and visual supports to aid her comprehension.

Outcome:

After six months of consistent therapy and support, Emily showed improvement in her expressive language abilities. She began participating more in class and displayed increased confidence in social settings. The collaboration between her therapist, school, and parents played a crucial role in her progress.

Recent Psychology Research Findings

Recent findings in psychology have shed new light on the intricacies of Communication Disorders. Researchers have delved deeper into the multifaceted etiologies, pinpointing a convergence of genetic, neurological, environmental, and cognitive factors (Bishop et al., 2017). Genetics, for instance, have been spotlighted as crucial contributors, with specific gene variants linked to speech and language impairments. On the neurological front, advances in neuroimaging have elucidated the distinct brain structures and pathways associated with these disorders, emphasizing the role of the left hemisphere and the areas related to speech processing (Morgan et al., 2018).

Cognitive research has spotlighted the importance of working memory, mainly capacity and efficiency, in shaping one's linguistic abilities. Environmental factors, especially early exposure to rich linguistic environments, have been shown to have a pivotal role in modulating the severity and manifestation of these disorders. Lastly, the co-occurrence of other developmental disorders like ADHD has been explored, indicating a complex interplay and potential shared underlying mechanisms (Beitchman et al., 2014). As our understanding deepens, the focus shifts towards more personalized and effective interventions catering to these newfound insights.

Treatment and Interventions

For Communication Disorders, treatment and interventions are tailored to the specific disorder and the unique needs of the individual. The main goal is to improve the individual's ability to communicate effectively and enhance their quality of life. Here's an overview of treatments and interventions for Communication Disorders, supported by literature:

• Speech and Language Therapy (SLT): The most common intervention for communication disorders is speech and language therapy. It involves working with a certified speech-language pathologist (SLP) to develop and enhance communication skills. Techniques might include articulation therapy, language intervention activities, and oral-motor/feeding and swallowing therapy (Paul & Norbury, 2012).
• Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC): For those with severe speech or language problems, AAC methods can be beneficial. These can range from basic communication boards to sophisticated computerized systems (Beukelman & Mirenda, 2013).
• Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT): This approach emphasizes improving the quality of the parent-child relationship to foster language development. Parents are coached in real-time to respond to their child's communication attempts positively (Gallagher, 2014).
• Audiological Interventions: If there are hearing difficulties contributing to the communication disorder, hearing aids or cochlear implants might be recommended (Moeller et al., 2007).
• Social Skills Training: For children who have social communication difficulties, group therapy sessions focused on enhancing social interactions can be beneficial (Bauminger, 2007).
• Educational Interventions: School-based interventions, like individualized education plans (IEPs) or specialized reading and writing instruction, can support children facing academic challenges due to their communication disorder (Catts et al., 2005).
• Pharmacological Interventions: Although primarily used for comorbid conditions, medications might sometimes be prescribed to address associated symptoms or other co-existing conditions. It's crucial to consult with a physician about potential benefits and risks (Reddihough & Collins, 2003).

Implications if Untreated

Untreated Communication Disorders present a plethora of challenges that can manifest across different spheres of an individual's life. One of the most immediate areas impacted is academics. Children with untreated communication disorders often find themselves navigating an educational landscape riddled with barriers. Their struggle to comprehend instructions can hinder their ability to engage thoroughly with reading materials. Classroom participation, a vital aspect of the learning process, becomes an arduous task as these children might find it challenging to immerse themselves in discussions or articulate their understanding, be it verbally or through written assignments. Over time, the cumulative effect of these challenges often results in diminished academic achievements. The consistent lagging behind peers can diminish their confidence and enthusiasm towards education, leading to an increased likelihood of them discontinuing their educational journey prematurely (Catts et al., 2001).

The ramifications of untreated Communication Disorders aren't limited to the academic realm. Social interactions, the bedrock of human connections, also bear the brunt of these disorders. Children confronted with such disorders often find even the simplest social interactions daunting. Initiating a conversation or even maintaining one becomes a hurdle. Over time, these difficulties can push them to the fringes of social circles, inducing feelings of isolation. The consistent inability to forge meaningful connections and friendships exacerbates this sense of isolation. This often culminates in a deep-seated feeling of solitude and a pervasive sense of not belonging to their immediate community (Conti-Ramsden & Botting, 2004).

Beyond the academic and social challenges lies a spectrum of emotional and behavioral complications. The persistent frustrations stemming from impaired communication can take a toll on their emotional well-being. Over time, the recurring feeling of being misunderstood or not being able to express oneself can breed stress and aggravation. This emotional turmoil can manifest in various ways – from heightened anxiety and episodes of depression to more pronounced behavioral disorders. The consistent emotional and behavioral disturbances can further exacerbate their academic and social challenges, creating a feedback loop of difficulties.

Summary

Communication is undeniably the bedrock of human connections, playing an essential role in fostering mutual understanding, empathy, and cooperation among individuals. It is through the exchange of words, gestures, and emotions that we navigate our relationships, comprehend our environment, and define our self-worth (Kendon, 2004). In this matrix of social interactions, effective communication is not merely about conveying information; it's about building connections, sharing experiences, and forming the foundation of our social fabric.

However, when individuals grapple with Communication Disorders, their ability to traverse this intricate network of social connections gets significantly impaired. Children with such disorders face multifaceted challenges. Academically, they often lag behind, struggling to comprehend classroom instructions, engage with reading materials, and articulate their knowledge, leading to decreased academic outcomes (Catts et al., 2001). But perhaps even more poignant is the toll it takes on their social life. Their difficulties in initiating and sustaining conversations can push them to the periphery of social circles, inducing a profound sense of isolation and alienation (Conti-Ramsden & Botting, 2004). Over time, this sense of not belonging, of being perpetually misunderstood, can breed intense emotional and behavioral disturbances, from heightened anxiety and depression to pronounced behavioral disorders.

This emotional tumult is not merely a by-product of the communication challenges they face but is deeply intertwined with their struggle for social connection. For without effective communication, the very essence of human connection - the shared experiences, mutual understanding, and empathetic exchanges - remains elusive. In its absence, the foundations of trust and belongingness are eroded, significantly impacting an individual's social and emotional development.

Overcoming a Communication Disorder is a profound journey intertwined with individual determination, the backing of family, and the guidance of professionals. Confidence and resilience become critical cornerstones in navigating this path, more so given the innate challenges posed by such disorders. Grounding oneself in psychological and therapeutic insights offers a structured roadmap to enhance resilience and self-assurance. A cornerstone to this journey is the importance of early intervention. An early diagnosis paired with timely therapeutic steps paves the way for foundational communication skills. Through avenues like speech and language therapy, behavioral strategies, and specialized training, individuals can harness essential tools for better communication, subsequently invigorating their confidence (Paul & Norbury, 2012).

A conducive and supportive environment, both at home and in educational institutions, is indispensable. The sheer power of encouragement from families, teachers, and peers cannot be overstated. By fostering a positive self-image and continually celebrating even the smallest achievements, individuals are instilled with a profound sense of accomplishment (Conti-Ramsden & Durkin, 2016). As social interactions form the crux of human experience, engaging in tailored social skills training becomes paramount. These programs furnish individuals with strategies to adeptly navigate social scenarios, decipher cues, and maintain balanced conversations, thereby enhancing their social competence (Gresham et al., 2001).

Empowerment often emerges from understanding; thus, psychoeducation serves as a beacon. When individuals grasp the intricacies of their disorder, they are better positioned for self-advocacy, effective communication of their needs, and proactive challenge management (Bishop, 2014). Concurrently, techniques like mindfulness, meditation, and cognitive-behavioral strategies emerge as bastions against the emotional and psychological tolls of communication disorders. By adopting these strategies, one can cultivate resilience, minimize anxiety, and foster an optimistic perspective on life's trials (Semple et al., 2005).

Beyond communication, it's vital to seek avenues of self-expression and mastery. Engaging in strength-based activities, be it art, sports, or music, presents opportunities for success, thereby solidifying a positive self-image. Lastly, the significance of peer connections cannot be overstated. Finding solace in the company of those with shared challenges offers a sanctuary to exchange experiences, hone coping mechanisms, and experience the warmth of belonging. In this vein, group therapies and support groups emerge as invaluable resources (St. Clair et al., 2011).

References

Bauminger, N. (2007). Brief report: Group social-multimodal intervention for HFASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(8), 1605-1615.

Beitchman, J. H., & Brownlie, E. B. (2014). Language disorders in children and adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(9), 985-995.

Beitchman, J. H., Wilson, B., Johnson, C. J., Atkinson, L., Young, A., Adlaf, E., ... & Douglas, L. (2001). Fourteen-year follow-up of speech/language-impaired and control children: psychiatric outcome. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(1), 75-82.

Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative & alternative communication: Supporting children & adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Brookes Publishing Company.

Bishop, D. V. (2014). Ten questions about terminology for children with unexplained language problems. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49(4), 381-415.

Bishop, D. V. (2017). Genetics, cognition, and neurobiology of developmental dyslexia. Current opinion in neurobiology, 42, 19-24.

Catts, H. W., & Kamhi, A. G. (2005). Language and reading disabilities (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., Hogan, T. P., & Weismer, S. E. (2005). Are specific language impairment and dyslexia distinct disorders? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(6), 1378-1396.

Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E., Tomblin, J. B., & Zhang, X. (2002). A longitudinal investigation of reading outcomes in children with language impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45(6), 1142-1157.

Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J. B. (2001). Estimating the risk of future reading difficulties in kindergarten children: A research-based model and its clinical implementation. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32(1), 38-50.

Conti-Ramsden, G., & Botting, N. (2004). Social difficulties and victimization in children with SLI at 11 years of age. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(1), 145-161.

Conti-Ramsden, G., & Durkin, K. (2016). What factors influence language impairment? Considering resilience as well as risk. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1693), 20160009.

Gaab, N., Gabrieli, J. D., & Glover, G. H. (2007). Resting in peace or noise: Scanner background noise suppresses default-mode network. Human brain mapping, 28(7), 603-607.

Gallagher, N. (2014). Parent-child interaction therapy for toddlers: A pilot study. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 36(2), 121-139.

Gresham, F. M., Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2001). Interpreting outcomes of social skills training for students with high-incidence disabilities. Exceptional Children, 67(3), 331-344.

Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Paul H Brookes Publishing.

Howe, T. (2008). The quality of life of children with chronic communication disorders. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 72(2), 249-257.

Joanisse, M. F., Manis, F. R., Keating, P., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2000). Language deficits in dyslexic children: Speech perception, phonology, and morphology. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77(1), 30-60.

Johnson, C. J., Beitchman, J. H., & Brownlie, E. B. (1999). Twenty-year follow-up of children with and without speech-language impairments: Family, educational, occupational, and quality of life outcomes. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8(1), 51-59.

Kavale, K. A., & Mostert, M. P. (2004). Social skills interventions for individuals with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27(1), 31-43.

Kelly, P.A., Viding, E., Wallace, G.L., Schaer, M., De Brito, S.A., Robustelli, B., & McCrory, E.J. (2019). Cortical thickness, surface area and subcortical volume differentially contribute to cognitive heterogeneity in Parkinson's disease. PloS one, 14(2), e0211944.

Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press.

Malinowski, P., & Shalamanova, L. (2020). Meditation and cognitive ageing: the role of mindfulness meditation in building cognitive reserve. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 4(2), 184-197.

Moeller, M. P., Tomblin, J. B., Yoshinaga-Itano, C., Connor, C. M., & Jerger, S. (2007). Current state of knowledge: language and literacy of children with hearing impairment. Ear and Hearing, 28(6), 740-753.

Morgan, A. T., & Webster, R. (2018). Aetiology of childhood apraxia of speech: A clinical practice update for paediatricians. Journal of paediatrics and child health, 54(9), 961-965.

Newbury, D. F., & Monaco, A. P. (2010). Genetic advances in the study of speech and language disorders. Neuron, 68(2), 309-320.

Paul, R., & Norbury, C. F. (2012). Language disorders from infancy through adolescence: Listening, speaking, reading, writing, and communicating (4th ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences.

Reddihough, D. S., & Collins, K. J. (2003). The epidemiology and causes of cerebral palsy. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 49(1), 7-12.

Redmond, S. M. (2011). Peer victimization among students with specific language impairment, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and typical development. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42(4), 520-535.

Redmond, S. M., & Ash, A. C. (2014). Symptoms of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in children with language disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(3), 964-975.

Semple, R. J., Reid, E. F. G., & Miller, L. (2005). Treating anxiety with mindfulness: An open trial of mindfulness training for anxious children. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 19(4), 379-392.

Simonoff, E., Pickles, A., Charman, T., Chandler, S., Loucas, T., & Baird, G. (2008). Psychiatric disorders in children with autism spectrum disorders: prevalence, comorbidity, and associated factors in a population-derived sample. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 47(8), 921-929.

St. Clair, M. C., Pickles, A., Durkin, K., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2011). A longitudinal study of behavioral, emotional and social difficulties in individuals with a history of specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Communication Disorders, 44(2), 186-199.

Stevens, V. (2002). Parent–child communication. Prevention Researcher, 9(4), 1-4.

Stromswold, K. (1998). The genetics of speech and language impairments. New England Journal of Medicine, 339(4), 280-282.

Swearer, S. M., Espelage, D. L., Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2010). What can be done about school bullying? Linking research to educational practice. Educational Researcher, 39(1), 38-47.

Tager-Flusberg, H., & Kasari, C. (2013). Minimally verbal school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder: The neglected end of the spectrum. Autism Research, 6(6), 468-478.

Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2019). Media use and screen time in adolescence: Associations with happiness and other indices of mental health. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 13(1).