Unspecified type Other Specified Personality Disorder (OSPD) within the context of DSM-5-TR is a classification for individuals who demonstrate a constellation of personality disorder symptoms that lead to significant distress or impairment but do not align with the specific criteria for any one personality disorder (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2023). This designation acknowledges the diversity and complexity of personality pathology that cannot be encapsulated within the categorical types listed in DSM-5-TR, such as Borderline, Antisocial, or Narcissistic Personality Disorders. Individuals presenting with this disorder often experience interpersonal difficulties, emotional regulation problems, and maladaptive coping mechanisms. Their behaviors and thought patterns, although not meeting the threshold for a specific personality disorder, typically are pervasive, inflexible, and long-standing, starting in adolescence or early adulthood. The presentation is varied and can include features such as excessive emotionality, chronic feelings of emptiness, unstable self-identity, or nonconforming behaviors that are inconsistent with societal norms and lead to functional impairment across various domains of life (Skodol, 2012).

The clinical literature on OSPD suggests that the diagnosis is a placeholder for complex presentations where symptom clusters do not correspond neatly to the defined categories (Morey et al., 2013). These individuals might present with a myriad of personality features from different clusters—Cluster A (odd, eccentric), Cluster B (dramatic, emotional, erratic), and Cluster C (anxious, fearful)—without a clear or predominant pattern that fits a specific diagnosis. The unspecified nature of the disorder creates challenges in the therapeutic setting, as treatment plans typically benefit from more definitive diagnoses. Thus, interventions are often tailored to the predominant symptoms and distress experienced by the individual rather than a specific disorder profile (Lingiardi & McWilliams, 2015).

The category of Other Specified Personality Disorder (OSPD) provides clinicians with a way to capture the complexity of personality disorder presentations that do not fit neatly into the defined categories of personality disorders outlined in the DSM-5-TR. Personality disorders are characterized by enduring patterns of inner experience and behavior that deviate markedly from the expectations of the individual’s culture, are pervasive and inflexible, have an onset in adolescence or early adulthood, are stable over time, and lead to distress or impairment.

When a clinician uses the OSPD diagnosis, it means that the individual's symptomatology does not match all the criteria for any one specific personality disorder. However, significant challenges in functioning or distress are still present due to personality traits. This can occur for several reasons:

• Mixed Symptoms: The individual might exhibit symptoms that are a mix of traits from several different personality disorders, not enough to diagnose anyone in particular, but together, they cause significant distress or impairment.
• Subthreshold Symptoms: A person may have some symptoms of a particular personality disorder but not enough to meet the full criteria as defined by the DSM-5-TR.
• Atypical Symptoms: The person may present with personality disorder traits that are unusual or atypical and do not fit the specific criteria of existing personality disorder categories.
• Temporary Personality Disturbance: Sometimes, individuals may exhibit personality disorder-like symptoms related to a stressful life event or other transient conditions.
• Cultural Factors: Cultural factors may influence behavior, which may not align with the DSM-5-TR 's criteria, primarily based on Western mental health concepts.

Regarding evidence and detail from the research literature, it is essential to note that the OSPD category needs to be more researched than the specified personality disorders due to its inherently broad and non-specific nature (APA, 2023). However, its inclusion in the DSM-5-TR acknowledges the spectrum of personality pathology and the need for flexible diagnostic categories to accommodate the wide-ranging presentations observed in clinical practice (Zimmerman, 2012).

When using this diagnostic category, the clinician must record the Other Specified Personality Disorder and why the presentation does not meet the criteria for any particular personality disorder. For example, a clinician might specify "Other Specified Personality Disorder (mixed personality features)" if an individual shows significant personality features from more than one personality disorder but does not meet the full criteria for any one disorder.

The "Unspecified Personality Disorder" category, on the other hand, is used when the clinician chooses not to specify the nature of the personality disorder. This might be because there is insufficient information to make a more specific diagnosis (such as in emergency room settings).

Diagnosing personality disorders can be complex due to their pervasive nature and the fact that personality traits exist on a continuum, with some traits considered within the range of normality for many individuals. A diagnosis of OSPD is usually made when it is clear that an individual's personality traits are causing significant problems in functioning, and these problems do not fit into another psychiatric category. Treatment for OSPD typically involves psychotherapy to improve functional impairment and distress. It may include cognitive-behavioral therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, or other modalities depending on the nature of the symptoms and the individual's specific needs.

Diagnostic Criteria

The DSM-5-TR 's diagnostic criteria for Unspecified Personality Disorder, which includes the type "Other Specified Personality Disorder," provide a framework for clinicians to identify personality disorders that do not fit the full criteria of the specific personality disorders listed in the manual (APA, 2023). This category is a catch-all for presentations that cause significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning and reflect personality dysfunction but are not sufficiently captured by the existing specific personality disorder diagnoses. The DSM-5-TR does not offer explicit criteria for "Other Specified Personality Disorder" as it is meant to encompass a range of possible presentations that do not fit elsewhere in the personality disorder diagnoses.

For an "Unspecified Personality Disorder," the clinician does not specify why the criteria for a specific personality disorder are unmet. This might be used when there is insufficient information to make a more specific diagnosis (APA, 2023). The "Other Specified" category requires the clinician to record why the presentation does not meet the criteria for any specific personality disorder and to specify the reason for not providing a specific diagnosis.

The unspecified type is often applied in settings where it may not be possible to obtain sufficient information to make a more specific diagnosis, such as in acute crisis interventions or when the individual is unwilling or unable to provide the necessary information for a thorough assessment (APA, 2023).

The literature suggests that while this diagnostic category allows for flexibility and acknowledges the diversity of personality pathology, it also presents challenges, including potential variability in how clinicians apply the criteria and the implications for treatment planning (Skodol et al., 2011). Treatment approaches for individuals diagnosed with Unspecified Personality Disorder are generally tailored to the presenting symptoms. They may involve psychotherapeutic interventions to improve functional impairment and reduce distress rather than targeting specific diagnostic criteria (Morey et al., 2013).

The Impacts

The impact of Unspecified type Other Specified Personality Disorder (OSPD) is considerable and multifaceted, affecting individuals' personal, social, and occupational functioning. Given the nature of OSPD, which encompasses a range of personality disorder features not meeting specific criteria, the consequences are as varied as the presentations. Individuals with OSPD may experience significant interpersonal problems, given that maladaptive personality traits often impede the capacity to form and maintain relationships (American Psychiatric Association, 2023). Furthermore, such individuals may demonstrate difficulties with self-regulation, leading to emotional instability, impulsive behaviors, and a diminished capacity for effectively managing stress (Skodol, 2012).

The pervasive and enduring patterns of behavior associated with OSPD can result in consistent underachievement in the workplace, frequent job changes, and even unemployment. The lack of specificity in the disorder may also challenge clinicians in creating targeted treatment plans, potentially leading to less effective interventions and a poorer prognosis (Morey et al., 2013). Additionally, OSPD is associated with a higher risk for comorbid mental health conditions, such as depression, anxiety disorders, and substance use disorders, compounding the overall impact on an individual’s functioning (Skodol et al., 2011).

In the broader context, the societal and economic implications of OSPD can be significant. The disorder may contribute to increased healthcare utilization, greater demands on mental health services, and, due to associated impairments, a higher burden on social support systems (Zimmerman, 2012). Despite the potential severity of its impact, OSPD still needs to be studied more than its specified counterparts, resulting in gaps in the literature concerning long-term outcomes and effective interventions (Zimmerman, 2012; Skodol et al., 2011).

Overall, the literature underscores the critical need for a comprehensive understanding of OSPD and its impact, emphasizing the importance of personalized assessment and intervention strategies to mitigate the adverse effects on individuals and society (Morey et al., 2013; Skodol et al., 2011).

The Etiology (Origins and Causes)

The etiology of Unspecified type Other Specified Personality Disorder (OSPD) is not well-defined in the literature, primarily because the category is a catch-all for a diverse range of personality disorder features that do not fit the criteria for a specific personality disorder as delineated in the DSM-5-TR (APA, 2023). However, theories and findings related to the general etiology of personality disorders suggest that OSPD, like other personality disorders, likely arises from a complex interplay of genetic, biological, psychological, and environmental factors (Livesley et al., 1998).

Genetic factors may play a role, as indicated by family and twin studies that suggest a heritable component to personality disorders (Torgersen, 2009). This genetic predisposition may affect the development of neural systems related to emotion regulation, impulse control, and interpersonal functioning, commonly impaired in individuals with personality disorders (Goodman et al., 2010). However, the specific genetic contributions to OSPD still need to be clarified due to its unspecified nature.

Environmental factors are also significant in the development of personality disorders, with many individuals reporting histories of childhood trauma, neglect, or abuse (Afifi et al., 2011). These adverse experiences can disrupt the development of secure attachment styles and adaptive coping mechanisms, leading to the persistence of maladaptive personality traits into adulthood (Bakermans-Kranenburg & van IJzendoorn, 2009).

Psychosocial factors like family dynamics, peer influences, and broader cultural contexts may further shape personality development. These influences can contribute to the formation of personality traits that deviate from cultural norms and expectations, which can manifest in various maladaptive ways, potentially resulting in a diagnosis of OSPD (Cramer et al., 2009).

Due to the heterogeneity of symptoms and traits in OSPD, pinpointing a single etiological pathway is challenging. Each individual's presentation may have a unique set of causal factors, reflecting personality pathology's complexity and nuanced nature. Thus, clinicians and researchers must approach the etiology of OSPD on a case-by-case basis, considering the individual's entire developmental and psychosocial context (Skodol, 2012).

Overall, the literature emphasizes the multifactorial nature of personality disorders, including OSPD, suggesting that an integrated model that takes into account genetic, neurobiological, psychological, and environmental factors offers the most comprehensive understanding of their origins (Livesley et al., 1998; Goodman et al., 2010).

Comorbidities

Unspecified type Other Specified Personality Disorder (OSPD), being a diagnostic category for personality disturbance that does not meet the full criteria for any specific personality disorder, is associated with a wide array of potential comorbidities. Given the diversity of symptom presentations in OSPD, it can co-occur with various psychiatric disorders, complicating the clinical picture and often exacerbating the overall impairment in functioning (American Psychiatric Association, 2023).

Mood disorders, such as major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder, are common comorbidities. The presence of maladaptive personality traits may predispose individuals to more severe, recurrent, and chronic mood disturbances (Zanarini et al., 1998). Anxiety disorders, including generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and social anxiety disorder, also frequently co-occur with OSPD. The relationship between anxiety symptoms and personality dysfunction is often bidirectional, with each influencing the onset and maintenance of the other (Grant et al., 2005).

Substance use disorders are another significant comorbidity, as individuals with OSPD may engage in substance use as a maladaptive coping mechanism to manage distressing emotions or interpersonal difficulties (Trull et al., 2010). Eating disorders, such as anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge-eating disorder, have been associated with personality pathology, including traits that may be seen in OSPD (Cassin & von Ranson, 2005).

Furthermore, individuals with OSPD may have an increased risk of impulse-control disorders and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), reflecting difficulties with self-regulation that are characteristic of many personality disorders (Skodol et al., 2007). The presence of comorbid conditions often complicates the treatment and may necessitate an integrated approach that addresses both the personality dysfunction and the specific symptoms of the comorbid disorders.

Understanding and addressing comorbidities in OSPD is crucial, as they can have a significant impact on the course, prognosis, and treatment outcomes of the disorder. Clinicians must assess possible comorbid conditions to plan comprehensive treatment (New et al., 2012).

Risk Factors

Risk factors for Unspecified type Other Specified Personality Disorder (OSPD), as with other personality disorders, are believed to be a complex interplay of biological, psychological, and environmental variables. While OSPD is a heterogeneous diagnostic category, some general risk factors applicable to personality disorders may also apply to OSPD.

Genetic predisposition is considered a significant risk factor for the development of personality disorders. Family studies have suggested that personality disorders, or their associated traits, can run in families, indicating a heritable component (Livesley et al., 1998). However, the genetic risk for OSPD needs to be clarified, given its nature as a residual diagnostic category.

Early life experiences play a crucial role, with childhood trauma, neglect, and abuse frequently reported among individuals with personality disorders (Johnson et al., 1999). Such adverse experiences can disrupt the development of secure attachment and affect the individual's ability to regulate emotions and handle stress, increasing the risk of later personality pathology.

Psychosocial factors also contribute to the risk of developing personality disorders. Dysfunctional family dynamics, such as poor parental bonding or the presence of parental psychopathology, may increase the likelihood of developing maladaptive personality traits (Johnson et al., 2006). Peer relationships and the social environment, including experiences of bullying or social isolation, can also influence personality development.

Cognitive and temperamental factors, such as high levels of neuroticism, impulsivity, or aggression, have been linked to personality disorders (Krueger et al., 2001). Individuals who exhibit these traits may be at a greater risk for developing OSPD due to their propensity for maladaptive responses to stress.

Finally, cultural and societal factors may influence the risk of OSPD. Cultural norms and expectations can shape the expression of personality traits and the perception of what is considered dysfunctional (Paris, 1996). Societal stressors, including socioeconomic status, discrimination, and access to resources, can impact mental health and the development of personality disorders.

Understanding the risk factors for OSPD is vital for prevention and early intervention efforts. However, given the unspecified nature of OSPD, more research is needed to understand the specific risk factors that contribute to this diagnostic category.

Case Study

Abstract: This case study explores the diagnostic challenges posed by "Elena," a 32-year-old female presenting with symptoms that did not fully align with any specific personality disorder (PD) but exhibited significant impairment across various domains of functioning. This report examines the complex interplay between her symptoms and the resulting diagnosis of Unspecified type Other Specified Personality Disorder (OSPD), as well as the therapeutic approaches adopted to address her diverse and fluctuating symptomatology.

Background: Elena was referred to the outpatient psychiatric clinic by her primary care physician due to concerns about her mental health following a period of significant stress after a relationship breakup. Elena reported a long-standing pattern of interpersonal difficulties, mood instability, and self-harm behavior that did not meet the threshold for a specific PD diagnosis.

Assessment: Initial assessments included a structured clinical interview for DSM-5-TR personality disorders, a review of her psychosocial history, and the administration of self-report questionnaires addressing various domains of personality, mood, and anxiety.

Findings: Elena reported chronic feelings of emptiness, fears of abandonment, and unstable interpersonal relationships, suggestive of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). However, she did not consistently exhibit impulsivity or identity disturbance, a crucial criterion for BPD. She also displayed perfectionism and a need for control, often associated with Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD), yet lacked the full spectrum of OCPD traits. The presence of additional mood and anxiety symptoms further complicated her clinical picture. Given the partial overlap with several PDs without fulfilling the full criteria for any, the diagnosis of OSPD was considered the most fitting.

Intervention: An integrative treatment approach was adopted, combining dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) for emotion regulation and distress tolerance skills, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for addressing maladaptive thought patterns, and supportive psychotherapy to reinforce Elena's strengths and coping mechanisms.

Outcome: Over 12 months, Elena gradually improved her mood stability and interpersonal relationships. She engaged well with therapy, utilizing the skills learned to manage her emotional responses and improve her social functioning. Elena's case remains a work in progress, highlighting the necessity for flexibility in the therapeutic approach for OSPD and the importance of ongoing assessment and adaptation to the individual's evolving needs.

Discussion: Elena's case underscores the diagnostic challenges when patients present with complex symptoms that do not neatly fit into the specific PD categories defined by DSM-5-TR. OSPD is a valuable diagnostic category, allowing clinicians to acknowledge and work with patients' difficulties, even when they do not conform to established diagnostic criteria. Elena's positive response to an integrative therapeutic approach also suggests the potential benefit of combining various treatment modalities to meet the unique needs of individuals with OSPD.

Conclusion: The case of Elena highlights the necessity of a diagnostic framework that accommodates the variability and nuance of human psychopathology. It also illustrates that treatment effectiveness for OSPD can be enhanced through a tailored, multimodal therapeutic strategy. Future research should aim to elucidate the specific therapeutic needs and outcomes of individuals diagnosed with OSPD.

Recent Psychology Research Findings

Research specifically targeting Unspecified type Other Specified Personality Disorder (OSPD) is relatively sparse due to its nature as a diagnostic category used when none of the established personality disorder criteria are fully met. However, there have been studies focusing on the broader category of personality disorders that offer insights relevant to OSPD.

One area of research examines the effectiveness of psychotherapeutic interventions for individuals with personality disorder features that do not fit into discrete categories. A study by Bamelis, Evers, Spinhoven, and Arntz (2014) found that schema therapy, a therapeutic approach developed for personality disorders, showed promise in treating a broad range of personality disorder symptoms, including those present in OSPD. Although their sample did not exclusively comprise OSPD patients, the findings suggest that schema therapy could be effective for complex personality issues not otherwise specified.

In epidemiology, a cross-sectional study by Zimmerman, Rothschild, and Chelminski (2005) assessed the prevalence of DSM-IV personality disorder not otherwise specified (PDNOS), which can be considered a precursor to OSPD in DSM-5-TR. Their findings indicated that PDNOS was a common diagnosis in clinical practice, suggesting that OSPD would likely be similarly prevalent, underscoring the need for more focused research on this population.

Regarding etiology and pathology, a research review by Livesley (2012) on the integration of etiological factors in the development of personality disorders could be extrapolated to apply to OSPD. Livesley's review suggests that OSPD, like other personality disorders, likely results from a complex interplay of genetic, environmental, and neurobiological factors.

Furthermore, there is an ongoing debate about the categorization and treatment of personality disorders, with some researchers advocating for a dimensional approach rather than categorical diagnoses (Skodol, 2012). This perspective is particularly relevant to OSPD, as individuals with this diagnosis may exhibit a range of symptoms that do not align with the categorical definitions found in the DSM-5-TR.

While these studies provide a general backdrop, they do not explicitly focus on OSPD. There needs to be a clear gap in the literature regarding this specific disorder, which calls for future research to understand better and treat this heterogeneous group of patients.

Treatment and Interventions

The treatment and interventions for Unspecified type Other Specified Personality Disorder (OSPD), while not extensively researched as a separate entity, are often derived from evidence-based practices used for other personality disorders due to the overlap in symptomatology. The interventions for OSPD are usually eclectic and must be tailored to the individual's specific symptoms and circumstances.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is a commonly employed evidence-based approach that has shown effectiveness across various personality disorders (David et al., 2018). CBT focuses on identifying and changing maladaptive thought patterns and beliefs, which could be beneficial for patients with OSPD who may have a variety of dysfunctional thought patterns.

Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), developed initially for Borderline Personality Disorder, is also frequently adapted for use in treating OSPD. DBT emphasizes skills training in emotion regulation, distress tolerance, interpersonal effectiveness, and mindfulness (Linehan, 2015). The skills modules within DBT can be highly relevant for managing the symptoms associated with OSPD.

Another approach is Schema Therapy, which integrates elements of CBT with other therapeutic approaches and is designed to address persistent maladaptive patterns or schemas (Bamelis et al., 2014). Schema Therapy aims to help individuals recognize and alter these long-standing patterns, which could be beneficial for those with OSPD whose symptoms are not fully captured by a single personality disorder diagnosis.

Psychodynamic Psychotherapy is another modality that can be effective, especially for those with complex interpersonal patterns and identity issues often seen in OSPD. It focuses on increasing self-awareness and understanding the influence of the past on present behavior (Leichsenring & Leibing, 2003).

In terms of medication, there are no drugs approved specifically for the treatment of OSPD. However, pharmacotherapy can help manage comorbid conditions or specific symptoms such as anxiety, depression, or transient psychosis (Paris, 2010). Medication is usually considered an adjunct to psychotherapy rather than a standalone treatment.

Group therapy, including skills-based and process-oriented groups, can offer additional benefits for OSPD patients by providing social support and opportunities to practice interpersonal skills in a safe environment (Weinberg et al., 2011).

Because of the heterogeneity of OSPD, treatment must often be tailored to the individual. Integrated treatment plans that combine several approaches may offer the best outcomes for individuals with OSPD (Livesley, 2007).

Implications if Untreated

Untreated Unspecified type Other Specified Personality Disorder (OSPD) can have a range of negative implications, affecting various aspects of a person’s life. The broad spectrum of symptoms associated with OSPD, including but not limited to emotional dysregulation, interpersonal difficulties, and identity disturbances, can lead to significant impairment in social, occupational, and academic functioning (Skodol, 2012).

Individuals with untreated OSPD may experience persistent difficulties in forming and maintaining relationships. These interpersonal problems can result in social isolation, frequent conflicts, and an inability to achieve intimacy, which may contribute to loneliness and a decreased quality of life (Lynch, 2013). Occupational challenges are also common, as the symptoms of OSPD can interfere with one's ability to function effectively at work. This can lead to job instability, unemployment, and financial difficulties (Millon et al., 2004).

Without treatment, the emotional symptoms associated with OSPD, such as mood swings and anger, can lead to maladaptive coping mechanisms, including substance abuse, self-harm, and potentially suicidal behavior (Paris, 2010). Furthermore, the presence of OSPD symptoms without a clear framework for diagnosis can complicate the recognition and treatment of comorbid conditions, potentially leading to a higher risk of chronic mental health issues (Bender, 2005).

The long-term implications of untreated OSPD can also extend to physical health. Chronic stress and behavioral issues related to personality disorder symptoms have been linked to a range of physical health problems, including cardiovascular disease and a shortened lifespan (Grant et al., 2009).

The identification and treatment of OSPD are crucial for mitigating these risks. Intervention strategies can help individuals develop healthier coping mechanisms, improve interpersonal skills, and manage the symptoms contributing to their distress and dysfunction.

Summary

The diagnosis and treatment of Unspecified type Other Specified Personality Disorder (OSPD) present unique challenges due to the complexity and variability of symptoms. Historically, personality disorders have been stigmatized, often viewed as character flaws or moral failings rather than as mental health conditions. This perspective has gradually shifted over the years as the mental health community has come to recognize personality disorders as legitimate, treatable conditions. In particular, OSPD, which captures a range of symptoms that do not neatly fit into one specific personality disorder, underscores the spectrum nature of personality psychopathology. This shift has led to a more nuanced understanding and a more compassionate approach to treatment and support for those affected (Paris, 2003).

The relational aspects of OSPD are especially troublesome. Interpersonal difficulties are a hallmark of personality disorders, and OSPD is no exception. These difficulties can disrupt relationships, leading to a pattern of unstable social connections that exacerbate the condition's symptoms. Such disruptions can be profoundly destabilizing, impacting the person's sense of self and confidence and often leading to a self-fulfilling cycle of relational turmoil and personal distress (Gunderson, 2001).

Moreover, the evolving understanding of personality disorders has influenced therapeutic approaches, emphasizing the importance of building a solid therapeutic alliance and applying evidence-based treatments tailored to the individual's specific symptom profile (Bender, 2005). There has been a growing acknowledgment that individuals with OSPD, like those with other personality disorders, require compassion, understanding, and specialized treatment to manage their symptoms effectively and improve their quality of life.

Furthermore, the therapeutic community has increasingly recognized the impact of such disorders on a person's identity. The instability in self-image and self-concept associated with OSPD can lead to significant difficulties in maintaining a coherent sense of identity, often contingent upon stable relationships and social roles (Skodol et al., 2002). The resultant impact on confidence and self-esteem can be profound, contributing to a range of maladaptive behaviors and psychological distress.

In summary, the diagnosis of OSPD encompasses a complex array of symptoms that historically may have been misunderstood or stigmatized. With the evolution of the mental health field, there has been a move towards a more inclusive and compassionate perspective that acknowledges the intricate interplay between an individual’s personality, environment, and mental health. Treatment approaches have become more sophisticated, aiming to alleviate symptoms, support the individual’s identity formation, and promote healthier interpersonal functioning.

References

Afifi, T. O., Mather, A., Boman, J., Fleisher, W., Enns, M. W., Macmillan, H., & Sareen, J. (2011). Childhood adversity and personality disorders: Results from a nationally representative population-based study. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 45(6), 814–822.

Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2009). The first 10,000 Adult Attachment Interviews: Distributions of adult attachment representations in clinical and non-clinical groups. Attachment & Human Development, 11(3), 223-263.

Bamelis, L. L. M., Evers, S. M. A. A., Spinhoven, P., & Arntz, A. (2014). Results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness of schema therapy for personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171(3), 305-322.

Bender, D. S. (2005). The therapeutic alliance in the treatment of personality disorders. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 11(2), 73-87.

Cassin, S. E., & von Ranson, K. M. (2005). Personality and eating disorders: A decade in review. Clinical Psychology Review, 25(7), 895-916.

Cramer, V., Torgersen, S., & Kringlen, E. (2009). Personality disorders and quality of life. A population study. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 50(6), 178-184.

David, D., Cristea, I., & Hofmann, S. G. (2018). Why cognitive behavioral therapy is the current gold standard of psychotherapy. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 4.

Goodman, M., New, A., & Siever, L. (2010). Trauma, genes, and the neurobiology of personality disorders. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1208(1), 103-109.

Grant, B. F., Chou, S. P., Goldstein, R. B., Huang, B., Stinson, F. S., Saha, T. D., ... Ruan, W. J. (2009). Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV borderline personality disorder: Results from the Wave 2 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 70(4), 533-545.

Grant, B. F., Hasin, D. S., Stinson, F. S., Dawson, D. A., Chou, S. P., Ruan, W. J., & Huang, B. (2005). Prevalence, correlates, and comorbidity of DSM-IV antisocial personality syndromes and alcohol and specific substance use disorders in the United States: Results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 66(6), 677-685.

Gunderson, J. G. (2001). Borderline personality disorder: A clinical guide. American Psychiatric Pub.

Johnson, J. G., Cohen, P., Brown, J., Smailes, E. M., & Bernstein, D. P. (1999). Childhood maltreatment increases risk for personality disorders during early adulthood. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56(7), 600-606.

Johnson, J. G., Cohen, P., Smailes, E., Kasen, S., Oldham, J. M., Skodol, A. E., & Brook, J. S. (2006). Adolescent personality disorders associated with violence and criminal behavior during adolescence and early adulthood. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(9), 1405-1412.

Krueger, R. F., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Silva, P. A., & McGee, R. (2001). Personality traits are differentially linked to mental disorders: A multitrait-multidiagnosis study of an adolescent birth cohort. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(3), 299-312.

Leichsenring, F., & Leibing, E. (2003). The effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy and cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of personality disorders: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(7), 1223-1232.

Linehan, M. (2015). DBT Skills Training Manual (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Lingiardi, V., & McWilliams, N. (2015). The psychodynamic diagnostic manual – 2nd edition (PDM-2). World Psychiatry, 14(2), 237-239.

Livesley, W. J. (2007). Practical management of personality disorder. Guilford Press.

Livesley, W. J. (2012). Integrated treatment: A conceptual framework for an evidence-based approach to the treatment of personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26(1), 17-42.

Livesley, W. J., Jang, K. L., & Vernon, P. A. (1998). Phenotypic and genetic structure of traits delineating personality disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55(10), 941–948.

Lynch, T. R. (2013). Treatment of borderline personality disorder: A guide to evidence-based practice. Guilford Press.

Millon, T., Grossman, S., & Meagher, S. E. (2004). Personality disorders in modern life (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Morey, L. C., Hopwood, C. J., Gunderson, J. G., Skodol, A. E., Shea, M. T., Yen, S., ... & Sanislow, C. A. (2013). Comparison of alternative models for personality disorders. Psychological Medicine, 43(12), 2533–2544.

New, A. S., Triebwasser, J., & Charney, D. S. (2012). The case for shifting borderline personality disorder to Axis I. Biological Psychiatry, 72(8), 630-633.

Paris, J. (1996). Social factors in the personality disorders: A biopsychosocial approach to etiology and treatment. Cambridge University Press.

Paris, J. (2003). Personality disorders over time: Precursors, course, and outcome. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17(6), 479-488.

Paris, J. (2010). Estimating the prevalence of personality disorders in the community. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24(4), 405-411.

Skodol, A. E. (2012). Personality disorders in DSM-5. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 317-344.

Skodol, A. E. (2012). The elusive nature of personality disorders: Matching diagnosis to treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 73(6), 813-818.

Skodol, A. E., Clark, L. A., Bender, D. S., Krueger, R. F., Morey, L. C., Verheul, R., ... & Siever, L. J. (2011). Proposed changes to the personality disorders classification for DSM-5. American Journal of Psychiatry, 168(3), 247-259.

Skodol, A. E., Gunderson, J. G., Pfohl, B., Widiger, T. A., Livesley, W. J., & Siever, L. J. (2002). The borderline diagnosis I: Psychopathology, comorbidity, and personality structure. Biological Psychiatry, 51(12), 936-950.

Skodol, A. E., Oldham, J. M., Bender, D. S., Dyck, I. R., Stout, R. L., Morey, L. C., ... & McGlashan, T. H. (2007). Dimensional representations of DSM-IV personality disorders: Relationships to functional impairment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(12), 1919-1925.

Torgersen, S. (2009). The nature (and nurture) of personality disorders. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(6), 624-632.

Trull, T. J., Jahng, S., Tomko, R. L., Wood, P. K., & Sher, K. J. (2010). Revised NESARC personality disorder diagnoses: Gender, prevalence, and comorbidity with substance dependence disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24(4), 412-426.

Weinberg, I., Ronningstam, E., Goldblatt, M. J., Schechter, M., & Maltsberger, J. T. (2011). Common factors in empirically supported treatments of borderline personality disorder. Current Psychiatry Reports, 13(1), 60-68.

Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Dubo, E. D., Sickel, A. E., Trikha, A., Levin, A., & Reynolds, V. (1998). Axis I comorbidity of borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155(12), 1733-1739.

Zimmerman, M. (2012). Is there adequate empirical justification for radically revising the personality disorders section for DSM-5? Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3(4), 444-457.

Zimmerman, M., Rothschild, L., & Chelminski, I. (2005). The prevalence of DSM-IV personality disorders in psychiatric outpatients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(10), 1911-1918.