Delayed ejaculation (DE) is a sexual dysfunction characterized by a marked delay or inability to achieve ejaculation during sexual activity despite the desire and stimulation to do so. This condition, recognized in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5), can occur either during partnered sexual activities or masturbation. Individuals with DE often report significant distress or interpersonal difficulty due to this condition. It is essential to differentiate DE from other sexual dysfunctions, such as erectile dysfunction or low libido, as these may present with different symptoms and require different approaches to management (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2023).

The presentation of DE varies among individuals. Some men may experience ejaculation only during specific types of stimulation or in certain situations, while others may not be able to ejaculate at all. This variability can lead to frustration, reduced sexual satisfaction, and strained relationships with partners. The condition can be either lifelong (present since the onset of sexual maturity) or acquired (developing after a period of normal sexual function). Psychological factors, such as anxiety or depression, as well as physiological factors, including certain medications or neurological conditions, can contribute to the development of DE (Rowland & McMahon, 2016).

In terms of psychological presentations, individuals with DE may exhibit signs of anxiety or performance pressure during sexual activities. They might also demonstrate avoidance behaviors, reducing sexual contact due to the fear of inability to ejaculate. Physiologically, DE can be linked to various medical conditions such as diabetes mellitus, spinal cord injury, or prostate surgery complications. The use of certain medications, particularly antidepressants like selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), has also been implicated in the onset or exacerbation of DE (McMahon et al., 2013).

For a comprehensive understanding and management of DE, a biopsychosocial approach is often recommended. This involves considering the complex interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors in assessing and treating the disorder (Perelman, 2014).

Delayed ejaculation (DE) can have profound emotional and relational impacts on individuals and their partners, often exacerbating the complexity of the disorder. The psychological and emotional consequences include anxiety, shame, and, in some cases, obsessive preoccupation with sexual performance.

Anxiety is a common emotional response for men with DE. This anxiety can be multifaceted, stemming from the fear of being unable to achieve orgasm, concern about satisfying their partner, or apprehension about the perceived abnormality of their sexual function. Over time, this anxiety can become cyclical: the worry about delayed ejaculation can exacerbate the condition, creating a self-fulfilling prophecy where the anxiety itself contributes to the persistence of DE (Rowland & Cooper, 2011).

Shame is another significant emotional impact associated with DE. Men may feel embarrassed about their inability to ejaculate, viewing it as a failure of their masculinity or sexual prowess. This shame can be internalized, leading to feelings of inadequacy, low self-esteem, and, in severe cases, depression. The secretive nature of this shame often prevents individuals from seeking help or discussing the issue with their partners or healthcare professionals, further isolating them and potentially worsening the condition (Althof, 2012).

In the context of relationships, DE can create significant strain. Partners may feel rejected, unattractive, or inadequate because they perceive themselves as unable to satisfy their partner sexually. This can lead to misunderstandings and misattributions regarding the cause of the problem, often resulting in feelings of frustration and resentment in both partners. The lack of open communication about the issue can exacerbate these feelings, potentially leading to a breakdown in intimacy and overall relationship satisfaction (McMahon, 2014).

Moreover, the obsession with sexual performance can emerge, particularly in a culture that often equates sexual prowess with personal worth and masculinity. Men with DE may become overly focused on their sexual performance, leading to a cycle where the pressure to perform exacerbates the problem. This can shift the focus of sexual encounters from pleasure and connection to a goal-oriented experience, reducing the overall quality of sexual and emotional intimacy (Perelman & Watter, 2016).

The emotional and relational impacts of DE are significant and multifaceted, often contributing to a cycle of anxiety, shame, and decreased sexual and relational satisfaction. Addressing these emotional aspects is crucial for the effective management of DE, often requiring a combination of psychological therapy, open communication with partners, and, in some cases, medical intervention.

Diagnostic Criteria

Delayed Ejaculation (DE), as classified in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), is a distinct sexual dysfunction with specific diagnostic criteria. The DSM-5-TR outlines these criteria as follows:

• Persistent Difficulty or Inability to Ejaculate: This is the primary symptom where a man experiences a significant delay in ejaculation or is unable to ejaculate during sexual activity. It should be noted that this difficulty occurs despite adequate sexual desire and stimulation.
• Clinically Significant Distress: The condition causes substantial distress or interpersonal difficulty. This is not merely about occasional delays in ejaculation but a persistent issue that leads to personal distress or relationship problems.
• Not Better Explained by a Nonsexual Mental Disorder or as a Consequence of Severe Relationship Distress: The diagnosis ensures that another mental disorder, significant relationship distress, or other significant stressors do not better account for DE.
• Not Attributable to the Physiological Effects of a Substance or Another Medical Condition: This criterion differentiates DE from sexual dysfunction that might be directly caused by substances (drugs, medication) or medical conditions.

The DSM-5-TR emphasizes the importance of considering the context and individual factors when diagnosing DE. It differentiates between lifelong DE (present since the individual became sexually active) and acquired DE (developing after a period of normal function). Additionally, the DSM-5-TR distinguishes between generalized DE (occurring with any partner and any sexual activity) and situational DE (occurring only under certain circumstances or with specific partners) (APA, 2023).

In the DSM-5, specifiers for Delayed Ejaculation (DE) are used to provide additional detail and context about the nature and characteristics of the disorder in an individual. These specifiers help clinicians and researchers better understand, diagnose, and treat DE. The specifiers for DE in the DSM-5-TR are as follows:

Lifelong vs. Acquired:

• Lifelong (Primary): This specifier indicates that the individual has experienced DE throughout their sexual life, ever since they became sexually active.
• Acquired (Secondary): This is used when the individual had normal ejaculatory function previously but developed DE later in life.

Generalized vs. Situational:

• Generalized: This specifier means that DE occurs regardless of the type of sexual activity, situation, or partner. It is a pervasive issue across all sexual scenarios.
• Situational: This is used when DE occurs only in specific situations or with certain partners. For example, an individual might experienceDE during intercourse but not during masturbation or with one partner but not another.

Severity:

• While not explicitly listed as a specifier in the DSM-5, the severity of DE can be considered in a clinical context. Severity can be based on factors such as the frequency of the issue, the level of distress it causes, and its impact on the individual’s sexual and relational satisfaction.

These specifiers are essential for a comprehensive understanding of DE as they allow for a more tailored approach to treatment. For example, understanding whether DE is lifelong or acquired can influence the type of therapy or intervention that might be most effective. Similarly, knowing whether the condition is generalized or situational can help identify underlying causes and formulate an appropriate treatment plan.

The DSM-5's inclusion of these specifiers reflects a nuanced approach to understanding and treating sexual dysfunctions, recognizing that these conditions can vary significantly in their manifestation and impact on individuals.

Research supports these criteria by highlighting the psychological and relational impact of DE. For instance, a study by Rowland et al. (2010) indicated that men with DE often experience significant psychological distress, which can exacerbate the condition. This research underlines the DSM-5's emphasis on the psychological component of DE. Similarly, McMahon et al. (2013) found that DE could profoundly affect relationships, thus supporting the criterion of clinically significant distress or interpersonal difficulty.

Moreover, research by Vansintejan et al. (2013) emphasized the importance of distinguishing DE from other conditions caused by substances or medical issues. Their study showed that certain medications, particularly antidepressants, can significantly impact ejaculatory function, thus highlighting the relevance of the DSM-5-TR criterion that DE should not be attributable to substances or other medical conditions.

The diagnostic criteria for DE in the DSM-5-TR focus on persistent difficulty in ejaculation, significant personal or relational distress, and the exclusion of other mental disorders, relationship issues, substances, or medical conditions as causes. This diagnostic framework is supported by research emphasizing DE's psychological, relational, and physiological aspects.

The Impacts

Delayed Ejaculation (DE) can have profound impacts on various aspects of an individual's life, extending beyond sexual dysfunction to affect psychological well-being, relationship dynamics, and overall quality of life.

Psychologically, individuals with DE often experience significant distress and feelings of inadequacy. Research by Perelman (2014) highlighted the emotional burden men face with DE, including frustration, embarrassment, and a sense of failure. This emotional turmoil can lead to a negative self-image and, in severe cases, clinical depression. Perelman's study also emphasized the societal pressures and expectations related to sexual performance, which can exacerbate the psychological impact of DE.

Relationships can be particularly affected by DE. A study by Althof (2012) discussed how DE can lead to misunderstandings and misattributions in relationships. Partners might feel rejected, unattractive, or inadequate, often mistakenly attributing the sexual dysfunction to a lack of desire or attraction. This can lead to decreased intimacy and relationship satisfaction. Althof's research underscored the need for open communication to mitigate these relational strains.

The impact of DE on sexual health and satisfaction is another critical area. McMahon et al. (2013) found that DE can significantly reduce sexual satisfaction for both the individual and their partner. The study pointed out that the dissatisfaction stems not only from the delayed ejaculation itself but also from the associated reduction in sexual pleasure and connection.

Furthermore, the broader implications of DE on mental health were explored in a study by Rowland et al. (2010). The researchers found higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms in men with DE compared to those without the disorder. This finding suggests that DE's impact extends beyond sexual function and affects overall mental health and well-being.

DE can have substantial and multifaceted impacts, including psychological distress, relationship difficulties, decreased sexual satisfaction, and broader mental health issues. These findings highlight the importance of recognizing DE as a complex disorder requiring a comprehensive approach to treatment and support.

The Etiology (Origins and Causes)

The etiology of Delayed Ejaculation (DE) is complex and multifaceted, encompassing a range of psychological, physiological, and relational factors. Understanding the origins and causes of DE requires an integrative approach that considers these diverse influences.

Psychological factors are often central to the etiology of DE. Studies by Rowland and Cooper (2011) and McMahon et al. (2013) have highlighted the role of anxiety, performance pressure, and psychological distress in DE. These psychological factors can create a cycle of performance anxiety where the fear of not achieving ejaculation leads to increased stress and, consequently, a higher likelihood of experiencing DE. Furthermore, McMahon et al. (2013) noted that psychological conditions such as depression and past traumatic sexual experiences can also contribute to the development of DE.

Physiological factors also play a crucial role in the etiology of DE. Vansintejan et al. (2013) explored the impact of various medications, particularly antidepressants like selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), on ejaculatory function. Their research indicated that the use of these medications is a significant risk factor for DE. Additionally, physiological conditions such as diabetes, neurological disorders, and hormonal imbalances have been implicated in DE development, as Rowland et al. (2010) highlighted.

Relational factors are another vital aspect of DE's etiology. Althof (2012) emphasized the impact of relationship dynamics on sexual functioning, noting that relationship stress, poor communication, and lack of emotional intimacy can contribute to DE. This research suggests that the quality of the relationship and the level of intimacy between partners can significantly influence sexual function.

The etiology of DE is multifactorial, involving psychological, physiological, and relational elements. These factors can interact in complex ways, making DE a challenging condition to understand and treat. The research underscores the need for a comprehensive and individualized approach when addressing DE.

Comorbidities

Delayed Ejaculation (DE) is often associated with various comorbidities, encompassing both psychological and physiological conditions. These comorbid conditions can exacerbate the impact of DE, complicate its management, and provide insights into its multifaceted nature.

Psychological comorbidities are frequently reported in association with DE. Studies have consistently shown a link between DE and mental health issues like depression and anxiety. For example, a study by Rowland and Cooper (2011) found that men with DE often exhibit higher levels of psychological distress compared to those without the disorder. This distress is not limited to sexual situations but extends to broader aspects of mental health, suggesting a deep interconnection between sexual function and overall psychological well-being.

Another significant comorbidity is relationship distress. Althof (2012), in his research, highlighted that men with DE often face relational challenges, including decreased intimacy and communication problems with their partners. These relationship issues are not just consequences of DE but can also contribute to its persistence, creating a complex cycle of sexual dysfunction and relational tension.

Physiologically, DE has been associated with certain medical conditions and specific medications. A study by McMahon et al. (2013) pointed out that DE can be a side effect of various pharmaceuticals, especially antidepressants like selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Moreover, medical conditions such as diabetes, neurological disorders, and hormonal imbalances have been implicated in the development of DE. The study by McMahon and colleagues provides crucial insights into how these physiological factors can contribute to or exacerbate DE.

Furthermore, the presence of other sexual dysfunctions alongside DE is also noteworthy. Research by Vansintejan et al. (2013) explored the co-occurrence of DE with conditions like erectile dysfunction (ED) and hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD). This comorbidity suggests that DE is often part of a broader spectrum of sexual dysfunction, necessitating a comprehensive approach to diagnosis and treatment.

DE is associated with a range of comorbidities, both psychological and physiological. Understanding these comorbid conditions is essential for a holistic approach to managing and treating DE, considering the interplay between these factors.

Risk Factors

Delayed Ejaculation (DE) is influenced by various risk factors that span psychological, physiological, and lifestyle-related domains. Understanding these risk factors is crucial for identifying individuals at higher risk of DE and guiding effective prevention and treatment strategies.

Psychological factors have been consistently identified as significant risk factors for DE. Research by Rowland and Cooper (2011) emphasized the role of psychological stress and anxiety, particularly performance anxiety, as crucial contributors to DE. Their study found that men who experience high levels of stress or anxiety, especially concerning sexual performance, are at a greater risk of developing DE. Additionally, they noted that past traumatic sexual experiences or deep-seated psychological issues could also contribute to the onset of DE.

Physiological factors, including certain medical conditions and medication use, are critical risk factors. McMahon et al. (2013) highlighted the impact of pharmaceuticals, particularly antidepressants like SSRIs, on ejaculatory function. Their research suggested that long-term use of these medications could increase the risk of DE. Furthermore, medical conditions such as diabetes, prostate surgery complications, and neurological disorders have been associated with an increased risk of DE. The study by McMahon and colleagues sheds light on how these physiological factors can disrupt normal sexual functioning and lead to DE.

Lifestyle factors can also play a role in the development of DE. A study by Vansintejan et al. (2013) explored the relationship between lifestyle choices and sexual health, finding that factors such as excessive alcohol consumption, smoking, and a sedentary lifestyle could contribute to sexual dysfunctions, including DE. This research underscores the importance of healthy lifestyle choices in mitigating the risk of DE.

In summary, the risk factors for DE are diverse, involving psychological stress and anxiety, physiological conditions and medication use, as well as lifestyle choices. Recognizing these risk factors is crucial for early identification and effective management of DE.

Case Study

Clinical Presentation: Benjamin, a 38-year-old software engineer, presented with a history of persistent difficulty in achieving ejaculation during sexual activities. This problem has been ongoing for approximately three years. Despite having adequate sexual desire and receiving sufficient stimulation, he either experienced significant delays in ejaculation or was unable to ejaculate at all during intercourse. Benjamin mentioned that this issue was present during both sexual intercourse with his partner and masturbation.

Impact on Patient: Benjamin expressed considerable distress regarding his condition. He reported frustration and inadequacy, which had begun to affect his self-esteem. He also mentioned that this issue had increased tension in his marital relationship, as his partner felt undesired and confused about the cause of the problem. Benjamin denied any history of sexual trauma or abuse. He had no significant past medical history but mentioned that he had been taking medication for mild anxiety for the past four years.

Diagnostic Assessment: According to the DSM-5-TR criteria for Delayed Ejaculation, Benjamin’s symptoms align with the diagnosis. His difficulty in achieving ejaculation was persistent and occurred in all settings (generalized), with significant distress reported, fulfilling the primary diagnostic criteria. The condition was classified as 'acquired' since it developed after a period of normal sexual function and was 'generalized' as it occurred in all sexual situations. No immediate physiological factors were identified, suggesting a predominantly psychogenic etiology.

Treatment and Management: A multidisciplinary approach was adopted, involving a urologist to rule out any underlying physiological issues and a psychologist for psychosexual therapy. The psychologist explored potential psychological contributors, including performance anxiety and the impact of his anxiety medication on sexual function. Couples therapy was recommended to address relational issues and improve communication between Benjamin and his partner.

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) sessions focused on addressing performance anxiety, improving sexual communication, and reducing the psychological burden associated with sexual activity. The possibility of adjusting his anxiety medication was discussed with his psychiatrist to mitigate any potential impact on sexual function.

Outcome: After six months of combined psychological and medical intervention, Benjamin reported a marked improvement in his ability to ejaculate and a reduction in associated distress. His relationship with his partner also improved significantly following couples therapy. Benjamin continues to engage in periodic psychotherapy sessions to manage residual anxiety and maintain improvements in his sexual function.

Conclusion: This case highlights the multifactorial nature of Delayed Ejaculation and the importance of a comprehensive assessment and treatment approach. It underscores the need to consider psychological and physiological factors in diagnosing and managing DE.

Recent Psychology Research Findings

Research in psychology has provided significant insights into the understanding and management of Delayed Ejaculation (DE). These findings cover various aspects, including psychological causes, the impact on mental health, and the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions.

Psychological causes of DE have been a significant focus of research. A study by Rowland and Cooper (2011) examined the role of anxiety and psychological distress in men with DE. They found that performance anxiety, stemming from fear of sexual failure or partner's expectations, was significantly associated with DE. The study highlighted the need for psychological interventions targeting anxiety reduction in DE treatment.

The impact of DE on mental health and quality of life is another critical area of research. McMahon et al. (2013) conducted a comprehensive study on DE's psychological and relational effects. Their findings indicated that men with DE often experience lowered self-esteem, depression, and relationship difficulties, further exacerbating the condition. This study emphasized the importance of addressing both sexual and psychological health in DE patients.

Therapeutic interventions for DE have also been explored extensively. Perelman (2014) investigated the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in treating DE. The study found that CBT, which involved strategies to reduce performance anxiety and improve sexual communication, was beneficial in managing DE. This research supports using CBT as a part of a multidisciplinary approach to DE treatment.

The role of psychoeducation in DE management was explored in a study by Althof (2012). The research suggested that educating patients about the sexual response cycle and normal variations in ejaculation can alleviate anxiety and improve sexual confidence, thereby reducing the symptoms of DE.

These studies collectively highlight the multifaceted nature of DE, emphasizing the importance of a holistic approach to its management. Psychological factors play a crucial role in both the development and treatment of DE, necessitating the integration of psychological therapies in DE management strategies.

Treatment and Interventions

Treatment and interventions for Delayed Ejaculation (DE) are varied and often require a multifaceted approach. Research has explored several treatment modalities, including psychological therapies, pharmacological interventions, and combined approaches.

Psychological therapy, particularly cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), has been a significant focus in the treatment of DE. Perelman (2014) conducted a study evaluating the effectiveness of CBT in men with DE. This therapy involved techniques to reduce performance anxiety, improve sexual communication, and address any underlying psychological issues contributing to DE. The study found that CBT effectively reduced the symptoms of DE, suggesting its utility as a primary treatment approach.

Pharmacological treatments have also been explored, though with varying degrees of success. McMahon et al. (2013) investigated the use of pharmacotherapy in treating DE. While certain medications, such as PDE5 inhibitors, were found to have some benefits, their effectiveness was limited, and not all patients responded favorably. This study highlighted the need for further research into effective pharmacological treatments for DE.

A combined approach involving both psychological and medical interventions has been suggested as an effective strategy for DE. Rowland and Cooper (2011) explored the benefits of combining psychotherapy with medical management. They found that addressing DE's psychological and physiological aspects could improve treatment outcomes. This approach might include psychotherapy alongside medication management or adjustments to current medications if they are contributing to DE.

Additionally, psychoeducational interventions have been identified as beneficial in DE treatment. Althof (2012) emphasized the importance of educating patients about the sexual response cycle and normal variations in ejaculation. This psychoeducation can reduce performance anxiety and improve sexual confidence, which can be particularly effective in cases where DE is primarily due to psychological factors.

These studies suggest that an individualized approach, considering each patient's specific causes and manifestations of DE, is critical for effective treatment. Combining psychological, pharmacological, and educational interventions can address the complex nature of DE and improve treatment outcomes.

Implications if Untreated

Untreated Delayed Ejaculation (DE) can have significant implications for an individual's psychological well-being, relationship health, and overall quality of life. Several studies have highlighted these consequences, underlining the importance of seeking treatment for DE.

Psychological impacts are a significant concern when DE remains untreated. Research by Rowland and Cooper (2011) demonstrated that men with untreated DE are at an increased risk of experiencing psychological distress, including anxiety and depression. The ongoing struggle with the condition and the associated feelings of inadequacy and frustration often exacerbate this distress. The study highlighted that without intervention, these psychological effects can worsen over time, affecting broader aspects of mental health.

The impact on relationships is another critical concern. McMahon et al. (2013) explored the relational implications of untreated DE, finding that it can lead to significant strain in intimate relationships. Partners may feel rejected or believe that the sexual dysfunction is reflective of broader relationship issues. This misunderstanding can lead to decreased intimacy, communication breakdowns, and, in some cases, the dissolution of relationships.

Furthermore, Althof (2012) emphasized the potential for a negative spiral of sexual dissatisfaction and avoidance in cases of untreated DE. The study indicated that persistent DE without treatment can lead to a reduction in sexual activity due to the associated stress and anxiety, further exacerbating the condition and impacting sexual health and satisfaction.

The broader implications for quality of life were also highlighted in research studies. Perelman (2014) noted that untreated DE could lead to a diminished sense of well-being and quality of life, as the condition affects not only sexual health but also self-esteem, relationship satisfaction, and overall happiness.

These studies collectively underscore the importance of addressing DE promptly and effectively. Untreated DE can have far-reaching implications, affecting psychological health, relationship dynamics, sexual satisfaction, and overall quality of life. This body of research advocates for a proactive approach to diagnosing and treating DE to mitigate these potential adverse outcomes.

Summary

Delayed Ejaculation (DE) presents as a particularly challenging sexual dysfunction, both in terms of diagnosis and treatment. Historically, the understanding and approach to DE have evolved significantly, moving towards a more inclusive and compassionate perspective. Early perspectives often overlooked the psychological and relational aspects, focusing predominantly on physiological factors. However, contemporary research and clinical practice now emphasize a more holistic understanding encompassing psychological, relational, and physiological dimensions.

The diagnostic process for DE is complex due to the variability in its presentation and the multitude of contributing factors. As highlighted by McMahon et al. (2013), distinguishing DE from other sexual dysfunctions and identifying its specific causes require careful clinical assessment. This complexity is compounded by the fact that many men may be reluctant to seek help due to embarrassment, stigma, or a lack of awareness that DE is a treatable condition.

The potential for relationship disruption in individuals with DE is significant. Research by Althof (2012) and Rowland & Cooper (2011) has shown that DE can lead to considerable strain in intimate relationships. Partners may feel confused, rejected, or inadequate, leading to decreased intimacy and potential relationship breakdown. These studies underscore the importance of including partners in the therapeutic process, emphasizing communication and mutual understanding.

Moreover, the impact of DE on personal identity and daily functioning is profound. As per Perelman's (2014) research, DE can adversely affect an individual's self-esteem and confidence, influencing their sexual identity and overall sense of self. This can extend to daily life, affecting social interactions, mental health, and general well-being.

DE is a complex disorder that requires a nuanced, sensitive, and empathetic approach for effective management. The evolution in understanding DE reflects a more comprehensive approach, considering the psychological, relational, and physiological aspects. This disorder not only impacts sexual health but also affects personal identity, relationship dynamics, and overall quality of life, necessitating a holistic treatment approach.

References

Althof, S. E. (2012). Psychological interventions for delayed ejaculation/orgasm. International Journal of Impotence Research, 24(3), 131-136.

McMahon, C. G. (2014). Management of ejaculatory dysfunction. Internal Medicine Journal, 44(2), 124–131.

McMahon, C. G., Abdo, C., Incrocci, L., Perelman, M., Rowland, D., Waldinger, M., & Ahn, T. Y. (2013). Disorders of orgasm and ejaculation in men. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10(4), 58–65.

McMahon, C., Abdo, C., Incrocci, L., Perelman, M., Rowland, D., Waldinger, M., & Ahn, T. (2013). Disorders of orgasm and ejaculation in men. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10(4), 58–65.

Perelman, M. A. (2014). A new combination treatment for premature ejaculation: A sex therapist’s perspective. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11(10), 2276-2285.

Perelman, M. A., & Watter, D. N. (2016). Sexual dysfunctions: Overview of prevalence, etiological factors, and treatments. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 13(2), 289-315.

Rowland, D. L., & Cooper, S. E. (2011). The impact of psychological factors on the sexual functioning of men with delayed ejaculation. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8(12), 3375–3384.

Rowland, D. L., McMahon, C. G., Abdo, C., Chen, J., Jannini, E., Waldinger, M. D., & Ahn, T. Y. (2010). Disorders of orgasm and ejaculation in men. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7(4pt2), 1668–1686.

Rowland, D., & McMahon, C. G. (2016). Disorders of orgasm and ejaculation in men. In Y. T. Sato & H. Yoshida (Eds.), Sexual Dysfunction: Beyond the Brain-Body Connection (pp. 102–115). Karger Publishers.

Vansintejan, J., Janssen, J., Van de Vijver, E., Vandevoorde, J., & Devroey, D. (2013). The effect of lifestyle changes on erectile dysfunction and quality of life: a systematic review. Andrologia, 45(3), 203-212.