In this journey of understanding the complex world of psychology, trauma has always stood out as a deeply fascinating yet often misunderstood phenomenon. It has drawn the attention of many in the research and clinical world for years. Central to traumatic experiences are flashbacks, which have a haunting way of thrusting individuals back into painful moments from their history. One can't help but wonder, why do these vivid memories come flooding back, and how do they differ from one person to another? In this article, I embark on an exploration of trauma flashbacks, pulling from the vast reservoir of academic research and therapeutic insights I've come across.

I begin by laying out a basic framework of trauma and its close companion, flashbacks, trying to make sense of their essence and distinct characteristics (American Psychological Association, 2013). From there, I delve deeper into what might cause these startling memories, uncovering the myriad triggers and the intriguing neural processes at play. As I dig further, I also categorize and describe the varied types of trauma flashbacks, aiming to expand our collective understanding of their diverse manifestations (van der Kolk, 2014).

The vast ocean of psychological research has been a beacon for me. I sift through what modern psychotherapy literature has to say about trauma flashbacks. From the more structured world of cognitive behavioral theories to the deeper realms of psychodynamic perspectives, I've gathered insights that paint a comprehensive picture of this intricate subject, offering a nuanced appreciation of its multifarious layers (Shapiro, 2001).

Healing, I've learned, is a journey. While challenging, it is not out of reach. In the article, I share some evidence-backed strategies and interventions that have shown potential in aiding trauma recovery and mitigating the severity of flashbacks. It's become clear to me how essential individualized therapeutic approaches are, and I emphasize their centrality in the healing process (Cloitre et al., 2011).

In conclusion, I reflect on the gravity of this topic by sharing my personal perspective. I stress the need for a broader recognition of trauma flashbacks within the wider mental health spectrum. Addressing this isn't just a scholarly pursuit for me; it feels like a societal obligation, given the deep and lasting scars trauma leaves on individuals and entire communities.

What is Trauma?

Trauma is profoundly adverse events' emotional, psychological, and physiological residue. It is not just the distressing events themselves but the individual's subjective experience of those events which can overwhelm their capacity to cope (van der Kolk, 2014). Traumas can be one-time events, prolonged experiences, or chronic, repetitive incidents like childhood abuse or domestic violence. They can result from experiences like natural disasters, violent attacks, wartime combat, serious accidents, or the sudden death of a loved one.

The American Psychological Association (APA) defines trauma as an emotional response to a terrible event (American Psychological Association, 2013). However, long-term reactions can include unpredictable emotions, flashbacks, strained relationships, and physical symptoms such as headaches or nausea.

What are Flashbacks?

Flashbacks are sudden and often vivid re-experiencing of past traumatic events. Unlike a simple memory recall, flashbacks can feel like a traumatic event is happening now. This means that a person can feel the same emotions and physical sensations they felt during the original trauma (Brewin, 2011). Flashbacks can be triggered by a sensory experience, like a sound or smell, or even an emotional state.

They are a core symptom of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), but not everyone with flashbacks has PTSD. They can range from brief moments where a trauma survivor feels disconnected from the present moment to extended reliving of the traumatic event. The intensity and frequency of flashbacks vary significantly among individuals (Brewin, 2011).

It is worth noting that flashbacks are not solely visual. They can encompass any of the five senses and can be deeply disturbing, often making the individual feel as though they are trapped in the traumatic event.

What Causes Flashbacks?

Trauma flashbacks are intense and often distressing re-experiences of traumatic events. Understanding these flashbacks' causes and triggers is vital for clinicians and those affected. Several internal and external factors can contribute to the onset of flashbacks. Let us delve into these causes, guided by authoritative sources:

• Memory Consolidation and Retrieval: How memories are processed and stored after a traumatic event might differ from non-traumatic memories. The hippocampus, a region of the brain involved in memory consolidation, may be affected by high levels of stress hormones, leading to fragmented and disorganized traumatic memories (Shin et al., 2006). Instead of being stored as coherent narratives, these memories might be stored as sensory fragments, making them more likely to be recalled involuntarily.
• Triggers: External cues, which can be sensory (e.g., a particular smell, sound, or visual stimulus) or situational (e.g., being in a location reminiscent of the trauma), can trigger flashbacks. Even internal cues, such as specific emotional states, can trigger the recall of traumatic memories (Ehlers & Clark, 2000).
• Amygdala Hyperactivation: The amygdala is a brain structure linked to emotional processing and fear responses. In individuals with PTSD, evidence suggests that the amygdala is hyperresponsive, leading to heightened emotional reactions to trauma-related stimuli, potentially causing flashbacks (Rauch et al., 2006).
• Dissociation: Dissociation, a coping mechanism where one detaches from reality, emotions, or the self, can increase the risk of flashbacks. It is posited that dissociation during the traumatic event can interfere with adequately processing the experience, leading to fragmented and intrusive memories later on (Ozer et al., 2003).
• Neural Network Activation: Flashbacks can be understood in terms of neural networks. When a traumatic event occurs, the associated memories, emotions, and sensations become interconnected in a neural network. Later, when one element of this network is activated—like an emotion or a sensory cue—it can rapidly activate the entire network, leading to a flashback (van der Kolk, 2014).

The Neuroscience of Flashbacks

The neuroscience underlying trauma and flashbacks is a rapidly evolving field that holds potential insights into the pathophysiology of conditions like Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). When we delve into the brain structures and processes involved, several vital components come to the forefront:

• Amygdala: The amygdala plays a central role in emotional processing and forming emotional memories. In the context of trauma, the amygdala gets activated by fear or threat, leading to heightened emotional reactions. Individuals with PTSD show hyperactivity in the amygdala, suggesting an amplified fear response to trauma-related stimuli (Rauch et al., 2006).
• Hippocampus: The hippocampus is integral to memory consolidation. Studies have found that individuals with PTSD may have a smaller hippocampal volume, which can impact memory encoding, storage, and retrieval. Traumatic memories, due to alterations in hippocampal function caused by excessive stress hormones, might be stored in a fragmented manner, leading to flashbacks' intrusive and involuntary nature (Bremner, 2006).
• Prefrontal Cortex (PFC): The medial prefrontal cortex (including the anterior cingulate cortex) regulates emotional responses initiated by the amygdala. In PTSD, there has often decreased activity in the PFC, indicating a reduced capacity to regulate or suppress negative emotions like fear or anger. This could explain the intense emotional experience during flashbacks (Shin et al., 2006).
• Neurotransmitters and Hormones: High levels of stress hormones, primarily cortisol, released during traumatic events, can affect brain structures like the hippocampus. Additionally, changes in neurotransmitter systems (like serotonin and norepinephrine) play a role in modulating the stress response and might be involved in the pathological changes seen in PTSD (Yehuda, 2002).
• Functional Connectivity: Recent studies using functional MRI (fMRI) have shown altered connectivity patterns between the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal regions in individuals with PTSD. This altered connectivity might be responsible for the enhanced reactivity to traumatic cues and the re-experiencing symptoms like flashbacks (Lanius et al., 2010).
• Neural Network Activation: When traumatic events occur, the associated memories, emotions, and sensations become interconnected in a neural network. Activation of one part of this network can trigger the entire network, leading to a flashback experience. This theory underscores the holistic nature of the brain's response to trauma and the interconnectedness of various cognitive and emotional components (van der Kolk, 2014).

Types of Flashbacks

Flashbacks are one of the hallmark symptoms associated with traumatic experiences. They involve vivid and involuntary re-experiencing of the traumatic event, often making it feel like it is happening again in real-time. However, flashbacks are not just a singular, homogenous phenomenon. They can manifest in various forms and intensities. Here are some different types of trauma flashbacks:

• Emotional Flashbacks: Unlike the more commonly understood sensory flashbacks, emotional flashbacks do not necessarily have a visual or auditory component. Instead, they involve a sudden and overwhelming influx of emotions felt during the traumatic event, such as fear, shame, or sadness. Individuals might not recognize these as flashbacks since they do not always directly "see" or "hear" the traumatic event (Walker, 2013).
• Somatosensory Flashbacks: These flashbacks primarily involve the sensation of touch or bodily sensations. An individual might feel pain, pressure, or other sensations related to the trauma on their body, even if they are in a safe environment. These flashbacks can be particularly distressing as they are "in mind" and feel physical (Van der Kolk, 2014).
• Auditory Flashbacks: In these flashbacks, individuals might hear sounds, voices, or noises that were present during the traumatic event. This can be as distinct as hearing someone shout or as vague as a muffled background noise (Brewin, 2011).
• Visual Flashbacks: People often associate these with the term "flashback." Here, the person visually re-experiences the traumatic event. It is as if a fragment of the past has suddenly become superimposed on the present, sometimes making it difficult for the individual to distinguish between the two (Brewin, 2011).
• Olfactory Flashbacks: Traumatic memories can sometimes be triggered by specific smells. In olfactory flashbacks, individuals might suddenly smell odors that were present during the trauma, even if those odors are not present in their current environment (Vermetten & Bremner, 2003).
• Dissociative Flashbacks: Unlike the immersive nature of other flashbacks, dissociative flashbacks might involve feeling detached from memory or watching the event unfold as an outside observer. It is a form of depersonalization or derealization, where the person feels disconnected from the traumatic memory (Holmes et al., 2005).

Flashbacks, stemming from traumatic experiences are multifaceted and can manifest in diverse ways beyond the commonly known visual re-experiences. These involuntary recollections can be intense emotional surges (emotional flashbacks), bodily sensations (somatosensory flashbacks), or specific auditory or olfactory reminders of the event. Moreover, some individuals may experience dissociative flashbacks, feeling detached or observing the trauma as an outsider. Understanding these varied manifestations is crucial for both individuals affected and clinicians working in trauma care (References: Walker, 2013; Van der Kolk, 2014; Brewin, 2011; Vermetten & Bremner, 2003; Holmes et al., 2005).

Psychology Research and Psychotherapy Approaches

From a psychotherapy perspective, the understanding and treatment of trauma flashbacks have deepened significantly over the last few decades, influenced by a growing body of psychological research. Here is a concise overview:

• Recognition of the Impact of Flashbacks: Flashbacks are not just simple memories; they are vivid and distressing re-experiences of traumatic events that can severely impact daily functioning and overall well-being. Therapists recognize the need to address them as part of a comprehensive treatment plan for trauma survivors (Ehlers & Clark, 2000).
• Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT): One of the most researched interventions for trauma-related disorders, especially PTSD, is CBT. Techniques like cognitive restructuring help individuals challenge and change unhelpful trauma-related beliefs. In contrast, prolonged exposure helps them confront and reduce the distress linked to traumatic memories, reducing the power and frequency of flashbacks (Resick et al., 2017).
• Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR): EMDR is another well-researched therapeutic approach for trauma. It involves recalling traumatic memories while engaging in bilateral stimulation (like side-to-side eye movements). EMDR is thought to help process and integrate traumatic memories, thus reducing their intrusive and distressing nature (Shapiro, 2001).
• Grounding Techniques: When clients experience flashbacks within therapeutic sessions, therapists often employ grounding techniques. These methods help the individual return to the present moment by focusing on current sensory experiences, thus pulling them out of the traumatic re-experience (Rothschild, 2017).
• Somatic Therapies: Recognizing that trauma is stored in the body, somatic therapies focus on bodily sensations and patterns. By addressing the physical components of trauma, therapists can help clients process and release traumatic energy, thereby reducing the intensity and frequency of somatosensory flashbacks (Levine, 2010).
• Importance of Safety and Stabilization: Establishing a sense of safety and stabilization is paramount before delving into trauma work. Therapists often spend initial sessions building coping skills, creating safety plans, and ensuring the client feels grounded and secure before directly addressing traumatic memories (Cloitre et al., 2011).
• Personalized Treatment: Every individual's experience with trauma and flashbacks is unique. Thus, treatment must be tailored to each client's needs and experiences. Flexibility and collaboration between therapist and client are essential for successful trauma therapy (Briere & Scott, 2014).

Flashback Recovery Options

Recovering from trauma and reducing the frequency and intensity of flashbacks is a multifaceted process. Here is an overview of some widely-recognized approaches and strategies in psychological literature:

• Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT): TF-CBT is an evidence-based approach designed specifically for trauma survivors. It incorporates cognitive-behavioral techniques to challenge and modify trauma-related distortions and exposure techniques to help individuals safely confront and process traumatic memories (Cohen et al., 2006).
• Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR): As mentioned earlier, EMDR is a therapeutic intervention where traumatic memories are processed while the individual engages in bilateral stimulation (like guided eye movements). Numerous studies have found EMDR effective in treating trauma and reducing PTSD symptoms, including flashbacks (Shapiro, 2001).
• Grounding Techniques: These are immediate strategies that help individuals anchor themselves in the present when a flashback occurs. Techniques can be sensory (e.g., holding onto an object or focusing on breathing) or cognitive (e.g., reciting a mantra or counting objects in the room) (Rothschild, 2017).
• Somatic Experiencing: Developed by Dr. Peter Levine, this approach focuses on releasing traumatic energy stored in the body. By tuning into bodily sensations and encouraging the completion of defensive responses, somatic experiencing can help in trauma resolution (Levine, 2010).
• Medication: While psychotherapy remains a cornerstone of trauma treatment, certain medications, like SSRIs, can help regulate mood and reduce symptoms of PTSD, including flashbacks (Friedman et al., 2007).
• Psychoeducation: Understanding trauma and its effects can be empowering for survivors. Psychoeducation gives individuals insights into their symptoms, normalizes their experiences, and offers coping tools (Briere & Scott, 2014).
• Group Therapy: Connecting with others who have experienced trauma can offer a supportive environment to share experiences, feelings, and coping techniques. Group settings can foster mutual support and validation (Yalom & Leszcz, 2005).
• Mindfulness and Meditation: Mindfulness practices help individuals anchor themselves in the present and cultivate an observant, non-judgmental stance towards their internal experiences. This can be particularly beneficial in reducing the distress associated with flashbacks (Follette et al., 2006).
• Seek Support: Trauma survivors need to seek support, whether from therapists, supportive friends, family, or community resources. Being surrounded by understanding individuals can foster a sense of safety and accelerate healing (Herman, 2015).

Recovering from flashbacks is crucial to mental health due to their intensely disruptive nature. Unlike typical memories, flashbacks thrust individuals into vivid, often distressing re-experiences of traumatic events, compromising daily functioning and social interactions. The constant re-living of these moments not only exacts a physical and emotional toll—manifesting as chronic stress and sleep disturbances—but also diminishes the overall quality of life.

To stave off these intrusive recollections, individuals may resort to avoidance behaviors, eschewing places, situations, or people reminiscent of the trauma, thereby risking social isolation and missed life opportunities. Moreover, persistent flashbacks increase the susceptibility to other mental health disorders like depression or anxiety. They can reinforce the neural pathways of traumatic memories, making them harder to disentangle over time. At its core, continually re-experiencing trauma through flashbacks can erode one's sense of safety and self-worth, rendering the world perpetually threatening. Thus, addressing and alleviating flashbacks is pivotal for holistic healing and restoring a sense of security and well-being.

Research into Flashbacks and Mental Health

The study and understanding of trauma flashbacks, and by extension, the broader realm of trauma-informed care, represents a pivotal frontier in contemporary mental health research and practice. Delving into the intricate tapestry of human cognition and emotion, trauma flashbacks glimpse how adverse experiences can leave indelible marks on the psyche.

Firstly, the significance of trauma flashbacks extends beyond the individual experience. Flashbacks are not isolated phenomena; they intersect with many other mental health issues, from depression and anxiety to dissociative disorders (Van der Kolk, 2014). This interconnectedness underscores the need for comprehensive and integrative therapeutic approaches that account for the multifaceted nature of trauma's aftermath.

Moreover, the recurrence of traumatic memories in the form of flashbacks has illuminated the complex interplay between memory, cognition, and emotion. Brewin, Gregory, Lipton, and Burgess (2010) note that traumatic memories are not processed like regular ones. Instead, they often bypass the typical autobiographical memory framework and are stored in a fragmented manner, leading to their intrusive and unexpected reappearance. This challenges the conventional understanding of memory processes and demands innovative therapeutic strategies.

The physiological correlates of trauma and flashbacks further exemplify their importance. Neuroimaging studies have revealed alterations in brain structures and functions in individuals with PTSD, particularly in regions like the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex (Shin et al., 2006). These findings provide a tangible link between psychological distress and neural architecture and pave the way for potential interventions targeting these neural pathways.

From a societal perspective, acknowledging the profound impacts of trauma and its manifestations, like flashbacks, is vital. Herman (1992) contends that the societal recognition of trauma validates survivors' experiences and can begin the collective healing and prevention process. Furthermore, trauma-informed care becomes not just a clinical imperative but a societal one, reshaping policies, institutions, and public discourse.

In conclusion, the study of trauma flashbacks and their broader implications epitomize the nexus of individual pain, neurobiological processes, and societal structures. Grasping their complexities is an academic pursuit of empathy, healing, and transformation.

Summary

The intricate relationship between trauma flashbacks, quality of life, and mental health recovery underlines the profound significance of trauma-informed care in contemporary mental health. Flashbacks, characterized by their vivid and often distressing re-livings of traumatic events, do not merely function as memories but can severely obstruct daily life and social relations. This disruption and the accompanying chronic stress and sleep disturbances can cascade into a deteriorated quality of life. Furthermore, the avoidance strategies often adopted to circumvent flashback triggers can lead to isolation and missed life experiences.

While these direct impacts are noteworthy, there is an added dimension of increased susceptibility to other mental health disorders, emphasizing the interconnected web of mental health challenges trauma survivors face. Advances in neuroscience have provided invaluable insights into the neural pathways impacted by trauma, offering potential avenues for therapeutic interventions. However, the recovery journey is not isolated to the individual alone; societal acknowledgment and trauma-sensitive policies play a critical role in collective healing. Collectively, understanding and addressing the repercussions of trauma flashbacks emerges not merely as a therapeutic imperative but as a societal one aimed at fostering holistic recovery and an enhanced quality of life for survivors.

In essence, addressing and recovering from trauma flashbacks is paramount for restoring quality of life, promoting mental health recovery, and fostering a society that acknowledges and addresses the profound impacts of trauma. Mental health recovery from the flash is vital for the following reasons:

• Flashbacks and Quality of Life: Trauma flashbacks are more than memories; they are intense, often distressing re-experiences of traumatic events, significantly impeding daily functioning, social interactions, and overall well-being.
• Physical and Emotional Impact: Constant re-experiencing of traumatic events through flashbacks can lead to chronic stress, sleep disturbances, and other health concerns, all of which adversely affect one's quality of life.
• Avoidance and Isolation: To escape the distress of flashbacks, individuals might avoid situations, places, or people, leading to potential social isolation, missed opportunities, and further deteriorating their quality of life.
• Co-morbid Conditions: Persistent flashbacks can elevate the risk of other mental health issues, like depression or anxiety, further hindering an individual's well-being and complicating recovery.
• Trauma-Informed Care: Mental health professionals must understand trauma flashbacks and their profound impacts. This understanding shapes therapeutic approaches, making them more holistic and effective in promoting recovery.
• Neurological Insights: Research reveals that trauma and flashbacks have tangible neural correlates, particularly in areas of the brain like the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex. Addressing these neural pathways could be pivotal for recovery.
• Societal Implications: Recognizing and addressing trauma is beneficial for individual recovery and vital from a societal standpoint. This recognition fosters collective healing, reshapes policies, and aids in building trauma-sensitive environments, all enhancing survivors' quality of life.

The experience of trauma flashbacks is indeed profoundly distressing, often plunging individuals into vivid, unwelcome re-enactments of harrowing past events. Such episodes are not mere memories but raw, immersive experiences that can disrupt daily life, casting a dark shadow over moments that might otherwise be filled with joy or peace. It is crucial to empathize with the immense weight that survivors bear, as flashbacks can often feel like an unyielding anchor to their traumatic past. However, amid this struggle, there is burgeoning hope. Contemporary mental health and neuroscience research continuously unveil new strategies and therapeutic interventions tailored to address trauma's unique challenges. With growing awareness and more refined tools at our disposal, the path to recovery, though challenging, is becoming more apparent. Survivors are not alone in this journey; a burgeoning global community of professionals, advocates, and fellow survivors works tirelessly to light the way toward healing, resilience, and a brighter future.

References

American Psychological Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.

Bremner, J. D. (2006). Traumatic stress: Effects on the brain. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 8(4), 445–461.

Brewin, C. R. (2011). The nature and significance of memory disturbance in posttraumatic stress disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 7, 203-227.

Brewin, C. R., Gregory, J. D., Lipton, M., & Burgess, N. (2010). Intrusive images in psychological disorders: Characteristics, neural mechanisms, and treatment implications. Psychological Review, 117(1), 210-232.

Briere, J., & Scott, C. (2014). Principles of trauma therapy: A guide to symptoms, evaluation, and treatment. SAGE Publications.

Cloitre, M., Courtois, C. A., Charuvastra, A., Carapezza, R., Stolbach, B. C., & Green, B. L. (2011). Treatment of complex PTSD: Results of the ISTSS expert clinician survey on best practices. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 24(6), 615-627.

Cloitre, M., Stolbach, B. C., Herman, J. L., Kolk, B. van der, Pynoos, R., Wang, J., & Petkova, E. (2011). A developmental approach to complex PTSD: Childhood and adult cumulative trauma as predictors of symptom complexity. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 24(5), 399-408.

Cohen, J. A., Mannarino, A. P., & Deblinger, E. (2006). Treating trauma and traumatic grief in children and adolescents. Guilford Press.

Ehlers, A., & Clark, D. M. (2000). A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38(4), 319-345.

Follette, V., Palm, K. M., & Pearson, A. N. (2006). Mindfulness and trauma: Implications for treatment. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 24(1), 45-61.

Friedman, M. J., Keane, T. M., & Resick, P. A. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of PTSD: Science and practice. Guilford Press.

Herman, J. (2015). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence--from domestic abuse to political terror. Basic Books.

Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and recovery. Basic Books.

Holmes, E. A., Brown, R. J., Mansell, W., Fearon, R. P., Hunter, E. C. M., Frasquilho, F., & Oakley, D. A. (2005). Are there two qualitatively distinct forms of dissociation? A review and some clinical implications. Clinical Psychology Review, 25(1), 1-23.

Lanius, R. A., Bluhm, R. L., & Frewen, P. A. (2010). How understanding the neurobiology of complex post-traumatic stress disorder can inform clinical practice: A social cognitive and affective neuroscience approach. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 122(4), 299-309.

Levine, P. A. (2010). In an unspoken voice: How the body releases trauma and restores goodness. North Atlantic Books.

Ozer, E. J., Best, S. R., Lipsey, T. L., & Weiss, D. S. (2003). Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 52-73.

Rauch, S. L., Shin, L. M., & Phelps, E. A. (2006). Neurocircuitry models of posttraumatic stress disorder and extinction: Human neuroimaging research—Past, present, and future. Biological Psychiatry, 60(4), 376-382.

Resick, P. A., Monson, C. M., & Chard, K. M. (2017). Cognitive processing therapy for PTSD: A comprehensive manual. Guilford Publications.

Rothschild, B. (2017). The body remembers volume 2: Revolutionizing trauma treatment. W.W. Norton & Company.

Shapiro, F. (2001). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR): Basic principles, protocols, and procedures. Guilford Press.

Shin, L. M., Rauch, S. L., & Pitman, R. K. (2006). Amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex, and hippocampal function in PTSD. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1071(1), 67-79.

Van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking.

Vermetten, E., & Bremner, J. D. (2003). Olfaction as a traumatic reminder in posttraumatic stress disorder: Case reports and review. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 64(2), 202-207.

Walker, P. (2013). Complex PTSD: From surviving to thriving. Azure Coyote.

Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. Basic Books.

Yehuda, R. (2002). Post-traumatic stress disorder. New England Journal of Medicine, 346(2), 108-114.