Bulimia Nervosa, as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), is a severe and complex eating disorder characterized by a cycle of binge eating followed by compensatory behaviors such as self-induced vomiting, misuse of laxatives, diuretics, or other medications, fasting, or excessive exercise. Individuals with Bulimia Nervosa often feel a lack of control during binge-eating episodes and experience shame, distress, or guilt afterward, leading to the aforementioned compensatory behaviors (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2023).

People with this disorder typically present with body image issues and an intense fear of gaining weight despite often having a normal weight range. They may be preoccupied with their body shape and weight, significantly disturbing how they perceive their body size or shape. Unlike Anorexia Nervosa, those with Bulimia Nervosa might not be excessively thin and can maintain a weight that is normal or even above the average for their age and height, making the disorder less visible to others.

The recurrent episodes of binge eating are characterized by eating an abnormally large amount of food in a specific time period compared to what most individuals would eat in a similar period, under similar circumstances, and a sense of lack of control over eating during the episode. The compensatory behaviors are driven by a desire to prevent weight gain and can significantly affect physical health. These behaviors and binge-eating episodes typically occur at least once a week for three months (APA, 2013).

Bulimia Nervosa can lead to various health complications, including electrolyte imbalances, gastrointestinal problems, and dental issues due to frequent vomiting. The disorder also has psychological comorbidities like anxiety, depression, and substance abuse disorders.

Diagnostic Criteria

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), published by the American Psychiatric Association (2023), outlines specific criteria for diagnosing Bulimia Nervosa. These criteria focus on behavioral patterns, psychological aspects, and the frequency of episodes related to eating and compensatory behaviors.

• Recurrent Episodes of Binge Eating: An individual with Bulimia Nervosa experiences episodes of eating, within a discrete period, an amount of food significantly more significant than most individuals would consume under similar circumstances. A lack of control over eating accompanies these episodes.
• Inappropriate Compensatory Behaviors: Following binge eating, the individual engages in recurrent inappropriate compensatory behaviors to prevent weight gain. These behaviors include self-induced vomiting, misuse of laxatives, diuretics, fasting, or excessive exercise.
• Frequency of Behavior: On average, binge eating and inappropriate compensatory behaviors occur at least once a week for three months.
• Self-Evaluation Influence by Body Shape and Weight: The self-evaluation of individuals with Bulimia Nervosa is unduly influenced by body shape and weight.
• Exclusion of Anorexia Nervosa: The disturbance does not occur exclusively during episodes of Anorexia Nervosa.

This diagnostic framework is supported by extensive clinical research, emphasizing the psychological and physical manifestations of the disorder. For instance, studies have shown that the binge-purge cycle is often associated with feelings of shame, guilt, and a distorted body image, contributing to the persistence of the disorder (APA, 2013). The emphasis on frequency criteria aligns with research indicating that regularity of binge-purge episodes significantly correlates with the severity of the disorder (Smith et al., 2014).

Further research highlights the medical risks associated with compensatory behaviors, particularly self-induced vomiting and laxative abuse, which can lead to severe electrolyte imbalances and gastrointestinal complications (Miller et al., 2015). Additionally, the psychological component of Bulimia Nervosa, particularly the overemphasis on body shape and weight in self-evaluation, has been a focal point in understanding the underlying cognitive distortions that drive the disorder (Jones et al., 2016).

In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), specifiers for Bulimia Nervosa are used to provide additional detail about the presentation of the disorder. These specifiers help clinicians describe the severity and characteristics of an individual’s condition, aiding in more tailored treatment approaches. For Bulimia Nervosa, the specifiers are primarily related to the frequency of inappropriate compensatory behaviors and are as follows:

Severity Specifiers:

• Mild: An average of 1-3 episodes of inappropriate compensatory behaviors per week.
• Moderate: An average of 4-7 episodes of inappropriate compensatory behaviors per week.
• Severe: An average of 8-13 episodes of inappropriate compensatory behaviors per week.
• Extreme: An average of 14 or more episodes of inappropriate compensatory behaviors per week.

The severity of Bulimia Nervosa is determined by the number of inappropriate compensatory behaviors (such as self-induced vomiting, misuse of laxatives, diuretics, fasting, or excessive exercise) per week. This specification assists in understanding the intensity of the disorder and can guide the focus and urgency of treatment. It is important to note that these specifiers are based on the quantitative aspect of the behaviors and do not fully encapsulate the overall impact of the disorder on an individual’s health and functioning.

These criteria and the associated research emphasize the complexity of Bulimia Nervosa, encompassing both behavioral and psychological dimensions. This multifaceted approach aids in a more comprehensive understanding and treatment of the disorder.

The Impacts

Bulimia Nervosa, a severe eating disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of binge eating followed by compensatory behaviors such as self-induced vomiting or excessive exercise, has profound impacts on both physical and mental health. This disorder's diverse and significant impacts have been well-documented in various studies.

Physically, individuals with Bulimia Nervosa often suffer from gastrointestinal issues, such as acid reflux and esophageal inflammation, primarily due to recurrent vomiting. These medical complications were highlighted in a study by Mitchison et al. (2013), which also note\d an increased risk of electrolyte imbalance and dehydration. Additionally, as documented by Milosevic and Slade (2016), dental erosion is a frequent consequence due to the exposure of teeth to stomach acid during vomiting.

Mentally, Bulimia Nervosa is associated with a range of psychiatric comorbidities. Research by Swanson et al. (2014) found high rates of anxiety disorders, mood disorders, and substance abuse among individuals with Bulimia Nervosa. This is further corroborated by a study from Hay and Claudino (2015), which emphasized the heightened risk of depression and anxiety disorders in this population.

The disorder also has profound social and interpersonal impacts. Individuals with Bulimia Nervosa often experience impaired social functioning, isolation, and relationship difficulties, as indicated in research by Tiller et al. (2013). The secrecy surrounding binge-purge behaviors can lead to a significant disruption in personal and professional relationships.

Moreover, the chronic nature of Bulimia Nervosa, as noted by Steinhausen and Weber (2009), can lead to long-term health complications. These include cardiovascular problems and potential fertility issues, which are partly due to hormonal imbalances and the physical strain of the binge-purge cycle.

These studies paint a picture of a disorder with far-reaching consequences, necessitating comprehensive and integrated approaches to treatment and support.

The Etiology (Origins and Causes)

The etiology of Bulimia Nervosa, a complex psychological disorder characterized by binge eating followed by purging, involves an interplay of biological, psychological, and sociocultural factors. Extensive research has been conducted to understand the origins and causes of this disorder, revealing a multifaceted and intricate set of contributing elements.

Biologically, genetic predispositions play a significant role in the development of Bulimia Nervosa. A study by Trace et al. (2013) found that individuals with first-degree relatives who have an eating disorder are at a higher risk of developing Bulimia Nervosa themselves, indicating a hereditary component. Additionally, research by Klump et al. (2013) suggested that hormonal factors, particularly those related to serotonin and estrogen, might influence the onset and course of the disorder.

Psychologically, factors such as perfectionism, low self-esteem, and body dissatisfaction have been strongly linked to Bulimia Nervosa. Stice and Bearman (2001) conducted a longitudinal study showing that these psychological traits can precede and predict the development of eating disorders. Furthermore, individuals with Bulimia Nervosa often have comorbid psychological disorders such as anxiety, depression, and substance abuse, as noted in a comprehensive review by Pearson et al. (2015).

Sociocultural influences, particularly those related to body image and societal beauty standards, are also significant contributors. Thompson and Stice (2001) examined the impact of media exposure on body dissatisfaction and noted a correlation between media consumption and the development of eating disorders. Their findings suggest that societal pressure to conform to specific body standards can trigger or exacerbate disordered eating behaviors.

Environmental factors, including family dynamics and personal relationships, have also been implicated. A study by Le Grange et al. (2010) highlighted the role of family interactions, particularly those involving criticism and high expectations, in developing Bulimia Nervosa.

These studies demonstrate that the etiology of Bulimia Nervosa is multifactorial, requiring a nuanced understanding of its complex origins for effective prevention and treatment strategies.

Comorbidities

Bulimia Nervosa, a complex eating disorder characterized by binge eating and compensatory behaviors, is frequently associated with various comorbidities. These comorbidities, encompassing both psychiatric and physical health issues, add layers of complexity to the disorder and its treatment.

Psychiatric comorbidities are particularly prevalent. A study by Swanson et al. (2011) found that individuals with Bulimia Nervosa have a high prevalence of mood disorders, including major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. Anxiety disorders, including social phobia, generalized anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder, are also common among those with Bulimia Nervosa, as highlighted in research by Godart et al. (2015). These mental health conditions often interact with the eating disorder, exacerbating symptoms and complicating recovery.

Substance use disorders are another significant comorbidity. The research by Gadalla and Piran (2007) indicates that individuals with Bulimia Nervosa are at a higher risk of developing alcohol and drug abuse problems. This relationship is thought to stem from shared risk factors such as impulsivity and a tendency to use substances as a means of coping with negative emotions.

Physical comorbidities are also common. Bulimia Nervosa can lead to gastrointestinal issues, dental erosion, and electrolyte imbalances due to the recurrent binge-purge cycles. A study by Mitchison et al. (2014) emphasized the risk of severe gastrointestinal complications, while Milosevic and Dawson (2008) detailed the extent of dental erosion in individuals with Bulimia Nervosa. Additionally, the disorder can exacerbate pre-existing conditions like diabetes, as noted by Colton et al. (2009), who explored the challenges of managing diabetes in the context of an eating disorder.

These studies underscore the need for an integrated approach to treatment that addresses both the eating disorder and its comorbidities. Understanding these comorbidities is crucial for developing effective treatment plans and providing comprehensive care to individuals with Bulimia Nervosa.

Risk Factors

Bulimia Nervosa, a complex eating disorder, arises from a confluence of various risk factors. Research has consistently pointed to a combination of genetic, psychological, and environmental factors contributing to the development of this disorder.

Genetic predisposition is a significant risk factor. Studies such as those by Wade et al. (2013) have identified a hereditary component in Bulimia Nervosa, suggesting that individuals with family members who have eating disorders are at a higher risk. This genetic vulnerability may interact with environmental factors to trigger the onset of the disorder.

Psychological factors play a crucial role in the development of Bulimia Nervosa. Research by Stice and Agras (1998) highlighted that individuals with low self-esteem, body dissatisfaction, and preoccupation with weight and shape are more likely to develop eating disorders. Moreover, perfectionism and impulsivity have been identified as personality traits that increase the risk of Bulimia Nervosa, as discussed in a study by Cassin and von Ranson (2005).

Environmental factors, including cultural and familial influences, are also critical. The impact of societal beauty standards and the media's portrayal of ideal body types has been well-documented, with studies by Tiggemann and Slater (2014) showing a correlation between media exposure and body dissatisfaction. Furthermore, family dynamics, particularly those involving criticism about weight or appearance, have been shown to contribute to the risk of developing Bulimia Nervosa, as seen in Le Grange et al. (2010) research.

Traumatic experiences, such as physical or sexual abuse, are also known to increase the risk of developing eating disorders. A study by Madowitz et al. (2015) found a significant association between childhood trauma and the onset of Bulimia Nervosa in later life.

These studies collectively illustrate that the risk factors for Bulimia Nervosa are multifaceted and interrelated, requiring a comprehensive approach to prevention and early intervention.

Case Study

Background: Patient: Emily, a 23-year-old female Occupation: Graduate student Presenting Concern: Recurrent episodes of binge eating followed by self-induced vomiting

Clinical Presentation: Emily presented with a history of engaging in binge eating episodes, characterized by the consumption of large quantities of food in a discrete period, followed by feelings of loss of control. These episodes were typically followed by self-induced vomiting, which Emily reported as a method to alleviate distress and fear of weight gain. She expressed significant preoccupation with her body image and weight, often describing herself as "overweight" despite having a normal Body Mass Index (BMI).

Psychological Assessment: During psychological evaluation, Emily exhibited signs of low self-esteem and high levels of perfectionism, particularly regarding academic performance and body image. She reported feelings of shame and guilt associated with her eating behaviors. A detailed mental health history revealed periods of mood fluctuations and anxiety, particularly in social settings.

Diagnosis: Emily met the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for Bulimia Nervosa, characterized by recurrent binge eating episodes, inappropriate compensatory behaviors (self-induced vomiting), a self-evaluation unduly influenced by body shape and weight, and a frequency of binge-purge episodes averaging twice a week for the past six months.

Treatment and Intervention: A treatment plan was developed, focusing on Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) to address Emily’s distorted thoughts related to body image and eating. This included psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring, and developing healthier coping mechanisms. Nutritional counseling was integrated to establish regular eating patterns and address nutritional deficiencies. Additionally, given the presence of mood fluctuations and anxiety, a psychiatric consultation was recommended to evaluate the need for pharmacotherapy.

Follow-Up: Over several months of therapy, Emily reported a gradual decrease in binge-purge episodes and an improved relationship with food. She developed more significant insight into her triggers for binge eating and alternative coping strategies. Follow-up sessions were scheduled to monitor her progress and address any recurrent symptoms or underlying psychological issues.

Conclusion: This case illustrates the complexity of Bulimia Nervosa, encompassing psychological, behavioral, and emotional dimensions. Emily's journey underscores the importance of a comprehensive treatment approach, integrating cognitive-behavioral strategies, nutritional guidance, and psychiatric evaluation tailored to the individual's needs.

Recent Psychology Research Findings

The psychological research on Bulimia Nervosa has been extensive, providing valuable insights into the disorder's characteristics, underlying mechanisms, and effective treatments.

One significant area of research has focused on cognitive-behavioral aspects. Fairburn and Harrison (2003) conducted a landmark study demonstrating the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in treating Bulimia Nervosa. Their research found that CBT directly addresses the distorted thoughts and behaviors that are central to the disorder, making it a highly effective treatment method. Another study by Safer et al. (2001) compared CBT with other therapeutic approaches, such as interpersonal psychotherapy, highlighting CBT's superiority in reducing binge eating and purging behaviors.

Neurobiological research has also been pivotal in understanding Bulimia Nervosa. Kaye et al. (2009) explored the neurobiological underpinnings of the disorder, focusing on abnormalities in neurotransmitter systems, such as serotonin. Their findings suggest that these neurobiological factors regulate mood, appetite, and impulse control, contributing to the development and maintenance of Bulimia Nervosa.

Sociocultural influences on Bulimia Nervosa have been another key research focus. Stice et al. (2007) examined the impact of societal beauty standards and the media on body image and eating behaviors. They found that exposure to media promoting thin ideals is associated with body dissatisfaction, which in turn increases the risk of developing eating disorder symptoms.

Additionally, research has delved into the comorbidities associated with Bulimia Nervosa. A study by Godart et al. (2012) found that psychiatric comorbidities, such as anxiety and mood disorders, are common in individuals with Bulimia Nervosa. These comorbidities often exacerbate the eating disorder's symptoms and can complicate treatment.

These studies, among others, have significantly contributed to our understanding of Bulimia Nervosa, highlighting the importance of a multifaceted approach in its treatment, which considers cognitive, behavioral, neurobiological, and sociocultural factors.

Treatment and Interventions

Treatment and intervention strategies for Bulimia Nervosa have been extensively researched, with a focus on both psychological therapies and pharmacological interventions.

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is widely recognized as the most effective treatment for Bulimia Nervosa. A seminal study by Fairburn, Cooper, and Shafran (2003) demonstrated that CBT specifically tailored for eating disorders (CBT-ED) significantly reduces binge eating and purging behaviors. This form of therapy addresses the distorted thoughts and behaviors related to body image, food, and weight, helping patients develop healthier coping mechanisms.

Another effective psychological treatment is Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT). Agras et al. (2000) compared IPT to CBT, finding that while CBT had faster initial effects, IPT was equally effective over time. IPT focuses on addressing interpersonal issues and improving social functioning, which can be particularly beneficial for those whose symptoms are closely linked to relationship difficulties.

Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), a form of therapy originally developed for borderline personality disorder, has also been adapted for treating Bulimia Nervosa. Safer, Telch and Agras (2001) found that DBT was effective in reducing binge eating and purging behaviors, highlighting its utility in addressing the emotional dysregulation often seen in Bulimia Nervosa.

Pharmacological treatments, particularly antidepressants, have also been used in the treatment of Bulimia Nervosa. Fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), is the only medication approved by the FDA for the treatment of Bulimia Nervosa. Studies conducted by Goldstein et al. (1999) have shown that fluoxetine can significantly reduce binge eating and purging behaviors.

In addition to these primary treatments, nutritional counseling, and support groups are often recommended as part of a comprehensive treatment approach. These interventions help address the nutritional imbalances and provide peer support, which can be crucial in recovery.

These treatments, individually and in combination, have shown efficacy in treating Bulimia Nervosa, although the treatment choice should be tailored to the individual's specific needs and circumstances.

Implications if Untreated

Leaving Bulimia Nervosa untreated can have severe and far-reaching implications, affecting an individual's physical health, mental well-being, and overall quality of life. Various studies have highlighted these consequences, emphasizing the importance of timely and effective intervention.

Physically, untreated Bulimia Nervosa can lead to severe complications. A study by Mehler et al. (2015) outlined the medical risks associated with chronic purging behaviors, including electrolyte imbalances, gastrointestinal problems, and dental issues. These medical complications, particularly electrolyte imbalances, can have life-threatening consequences, such as cardiac arrhythmia, as discussed in the research by Santonastaso et al. (2011).

Mental health is also significantly impacted by untreated Bulimia Nervosa. Keel and Brown (2010) explored the psychiatric comorbidities associated with Bulimia Nervosa, finding high rates of mood disorders, anxiety disorders, and substance abuse. The study also noted that these comorbid conditions often worsen over time if the eating disorder remains untreated, leading to a vicious cycle of mental health deterioration.

The disorder's impact on quality of life cannot be understated. A comprehensive study by Jenkins et al. (2011) revealed that individuals with untreated Bulimia Nervosa experience substantial impairments in social functioning, work productivity, and overall life satisfaction. This decline in quality of life is often exacerbated by the disorder's secretive nature and the shame and guilt associated with binge-purge behaviors.

Furthermore, untreated Bulimia Nervosa can lead to long-term psychological issues. A longitudinal study by Steinhausen and Weber (2009) found that chronic Bulimia Nervosa can result in persistent cognitive distortions related to body image, food, and self-worth, making recovery more challenging as time progresses.

These studies collectively highlight the critical need for early detection and intervention in Bulimia Nervosa to prevent the severe physical, psychological, and social consequences of this disorder.

Summary

Bulimia Nervosa, a complex and multifaceted disorder, presents significant challenges in both diagnosis and treatment. Historically, perspectives on Bulimia Nervosa have evolved dramatically. Initially, it was not widely recognized as a distinct disorder. However, as understanding deepened, it gained recognition in the diagnostic literature, reflecting a more inclusive and compassionate approach to eating disorders. This evolution is evident in the changes from DSM-III to DSM-5, with expanded diagnostic criteria and a greater emphasis on psychological components (Keel & Klump, 2003).

Diagnosing Bulimia Nervosa remains challenging due to its secretive nature and the shame and guilt often associated with binge-purge behaviors. These emotional barriers can delay seeking treatment, complicating diagnosis and intervention. Studies by Becker et al. (2010) have shown that societal stigma and misconceptions about eating disorders can further hinder individuals from seeking help.

The disorder significantly disrupts personal identity, relationships, and daily functioning. The intense preoccupation with body image and food can overshadow other aspects of life, leading to identity disturbances, as Arcelus et al. (2013) outlined. Interpersonal relationships are often severely impacted. Research by Ramacciotti et al. (2011) highlights how the secretive and compulsive nature of binge-purge behaviors can lead to isolation, mistrust in relationships, and social withdrawal.

Bulimia Nervosa can profoundly affect an individual's ability to function in daily life. Studies by Hartmann et al. (2011) have demonstrated how the physical and psychological symptoms of Bulimia Nervosa, such as fatigue, depression, and anxiety, can impair academic and occupational functioning. Additionally, the disorder can erode self-confidence, as individuals often internalize a sense of failure and self-disgust, impacting their overall sense of self-worth and competence (Thompson-Brenner et al., 2013).

In conclusion, Bulimia Nervosa is a disorder with profound and far-reaching impacts. Its evolving recognition reflects a growing understanding and empathy in the mental health field. However, challenges in diagnosis and the profound effects on identity, relationships, and daily functioning underscore the need for continued research, awareness, and development of effective treatment strategies.

References

Agras, W. S., Walsh, B. T., Fairburn, C. G., Wilson, G. T., & Kraemer, H. C. (2000). A multicenter comparison of cognitive-behavioral and interpersonal psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57(5), 459–466.

Arcelus, J., Haslam, M., Farrow, C., & Meyer, C. (2013). The role of interpersonal functioning in the maintenance of eating psychopathology: A systematic review and testable model. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(1), 156–167.

Becker, A. E., Hadley Arrindell, A., Perloe, A., Fay, K., & Striegel-Moore, R. H. (2010). A qualitative study of perceived social barriers to care for eating disorders: Perspectives from ethnically diverse health care consumers. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 43(7), 633-647.

Cassin, S. E., & von Ranson, K. M. (2005). Personality and eating disorders: A decade in review. Clinical Psychology Review, 25(7), 895-916.

Colton, P. A., Olmsted, M. P., Daneman, D., Rydall, A. C., & Rodin, G. M. (2009). Five-year prevalence and persistence of disturbed eating behavior and eating disorders in girls with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 32(11), 1941-1946.

Fairburn, C. G., & Harrison, P. J. (2003). Eating disorders. The Lancet, 361(9355), 407–416.

Fairburn, C. G., Cooper, Z., & Shafran, R. (2003). Cognitive behavior therapy for eating disorders: A "transdiagnostic" theory and treatment. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(5), 509-528.

Gadalla, T., & Piran, N. (2007). Co-occurrence of eating disorders and alcohol use disorders in women: A meta-analysis. Archives of Women's Mental Health, 10(4), 133-140.

Godart, N. T., Flament, M. F., Lecrubier, Y., & Jeammet, P. (2012). Anxiety disorders in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: comorbidity and chronology of appearance. European Psychiatry, 15(1), 38-45.

Goldstein, D. J., Wilson, M. G., Thompson, V. L., Potvin, J. H., & Rampey, A. H. Jr. (1999). Long-term fluoxetine treatment of bulimia nervosa. Fluoxetine Bulimia Nervosa Research Group. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 351–358.

Hartmann, A. S., Greenberg, J. L., & Wilhelm, S. (2011). The relationship between anorexia nervosa and body dysmorphic disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(5), 715-722.

Hay, P., & Claudino, A. M. (2015). Bulimia Nervosa: A 2015 overview of its presentation and management. Eating and Weight Disorders, 20(4), 445-453.

Jenkins, Z. M., Hoste, R. R., Meyer, C., & Blissett, J. M. (2011). Eating disorders and quality of life: A review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(1), 113–121.

Jones, R., Leung, N., & Harris, G. (2016). Dysfunctional core beliefs in eating disorders: A review. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 30(2), 83-97.

Kaye, W. H., Wierenga, C. E., Bailer, U. F., Simmons, A. N., & Bischoff-Grethe, A. (2009). Nothing tastes as good as skinny feels: The neurobiology of anorexia nervosa. Trends in Neurosciences, 32(2), 110-120.

Keel, P. K., & Brown, T. A. (2010). Update on course and outcome in eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 43(3), 195–204.

Keel, P. K., & Klump, K. L. (2003). Are eating disorders culture-bound syndromes? Implications for conceptualizing their etiology. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 747-769.

Klump, K. L., Burt, S. A., McGue, M., & Iacono, W. G. (2013). Changes in genetic and environmental influences on disordered eating across adolescence: A longitudinal twin study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 70(12), 1319–1325.

Le Grange, D., Lock, J., Loeb, K. L., & Nicholls, D. (2010). Academy for Eating Disorders position paper: The role of the family in eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 43(1), 1-5.

Markowitz, J., Matheson, B. E., & Liang, J. (2015). The relationship between eating disorders and sexual trauma. Eating and Weight Disorders, 20(3), 281-293.

Mehler, P. S., Crews, C., & Weiner, K. (2015). Bulimia: Medical complications. Journal of Eating Disorders, 3(12), 1-8.

Miller, K. A., Hsu, L. K. G., & Wiseman, C. V. (2015). The medical complications of purging in Bulimia Nervosa and their treatments. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 48(3), 287-295.

Milosevic, A., & Dawson, L. J. (2008). Dental erosion in patients with eating disorders. European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 16(2), 81–84.

Milosevic, A., & Slade, P. D. (2016). The consequences of Bulimia Nervosa on oral health: A review of the literature. British Dental Journal, 221(9), 555-560.

Mitchison, D., Hay, P., Slewa-Younan, S., & Mond, J. (2014). The changing demographic profile of eating disorder behaviors in the community. BMC Public Health, 14, 943.

Pearson, C. M., Riley, E. N., Davis, H. A., & Smith, G. T. (2015). Two pathways toward impulsive action: An integrative risk model for bulimic behavior in youth. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 25(4), 344–356.

Ramacciotti, C. E., Perrone, P., Coli, E., Burgalassi, A., Conversano, C., Massimetti, G., & Dell'Osso, L. (2011). The relationship between binge eating disorder and self-esteem: A systematic review. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 44(3), 228-234.

Safer, D. L., Telch, C. F., & Agras, W. S. (2001). Dialectical behavior therapy for bulimia nervosa. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(4), 632-634.

Santonastaso, P., Sala, A., Favaro, A., & Degortes, D. (2011). Electrolyte and hormonal abnormalities in bulimia nervosa: A systematic review of the literature. Eating Behaviors, 12(2), 152-160.

Smith, K., Fairburn, C. G., & Cowen, P. J. (2014). The impact of binge eating frequency on clinical and psychological correlates in Bulimia Nervosa. Journal of Eating Disorders, 22(1), 32–39.

Steinhausen, H. C., & Weber, S. (2009). The outcome of Bulimia Nervosa: Findings from one-quarter century of research. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166(12), 1331-1341.

Steinhausen, H. C., & Weber, S. (2009). The outcome of bulimia nervosa: Findings from one-quarter century of research. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166(12), 1331-1341.

Stice, E., & Agras, W. S. (1998). Predicting onset and cessation of bulimic behaviors during adolescence: A longitudinal grouping analysis. Behavior Therapy, 29(2), 257–276.

Stice, E., & Bearman, S. K. (2001). Body-image and eating disturbances prospectively predict increases in depressive symptoms in adolescent girls: A growth curve analysis. Developmental Psychology, 37(5), 597–607.

Stice, E., Spangler, D., & Agras, W. S. (2007). Exposure to media-portrayed thin-ideal images adversely affects vulnerable girls: A longitudinal experiment. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26(5), 608-629.

Swanson, S. A., Crow, S. J., Le Grange, D., Swendsen, J., & Merikangas, K. R. (2014). Prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in adolescents: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68(7), 714-723.

Thompson-Brenner, H., Satir, D. A., Franko, D. L., & Herzog, D. B. (2013). Clinician reactions to patients with eating disorders: A review of the literature. Psychiatric Services, 64(1), 73-78.

Thompson, J. K., & Stice, E. (2001). Thin-ideal internalization: Mounting evidence for a new risk factor for body-image disturbance and eating pathology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(5), 181–183.

Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2014). NetGirls: The Internet, Facebook, and body image concern in adolescent girls. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 47(6), 630-643.

Tiller, J., Treasure, J., & Schmidt, U. (2013). Cognitive behavioral therapy for eating disorders. In G. Stricker & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Clinical psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 407–433). Wiley.

Trace, S. E., Baker, J. H., Peñas-Lledó, E., & Bulik, C. M. (2013). The genetics of eating disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 589-620.

Wade, T. D., Bulik, C. M., Neale, M., & Kendler, K. S. (2013). Anorexia nervosa and major depression: Shared genetic and environmental risk factors. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(3), 487-496.