Other Specified Elimination Disorder (OSED), as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), is a clinical diagnosis that encompasses a range of atypical and diverse elimination disorders in children that do not fit the criteria for specific disorders like enuresis (bedwetting) or encopresis (fecal incontinence). OSED recognizes the significant distress and impairment experienced by children and their families due to various elimination problems. These problems can manifest as recurrent and age-inappropriate behaviors related to urination or defecation, which are not solely explained by medical conditions or medications. OSED is a helpful diagnostic category for clinicians, as it acknowledges the complexity of elimination disorders and allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the presentation of these issues in children.

Individuals with Other Specified Elimination Disorder may present with a variety of symptoms, including, but not limited to, daytime urinary or fecal incontinence, excessive frequency of urination or bowel movements, constipation, withholding of bowel movements, and avoidance of public restrooms or other specific toileting-related fears or rituals. These symptoms often lead to emotional distress, social difficulties, and impaired functioning in daily life. The presentation of OSED can be diverse and may include different combinations of elimination symptoms, making it essential for clinicians to carefully assess and tailor interventions to address the specific needs of each child. Early identification and intervention for OSED are crucial to prevent the long-term negative consequences of these disorders and improve the quality of life for affected children and their families.

Diagnostic Criteria

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR) includes the category of "Other Specified Elimination Disorder" for situations in which symptoms characteristic of an elimination disorder cause significant distress or impairment but do not meet the criteria for any specific elimination disorder. Clinicians use this category when they want to specify the particular reason that the presentation doesn't align with a specific elimination disorder, such as "low-frequency enuresis" or other specific reasons related to urinary or fecal symptoms (APA, 2023).

The DSM-5-TR does not provide specific diagnostic criteria for "Other Specified Elimination Disorder" (OSED). In the DSM-5-TR, elimination disorders are primarily categorized as Encopresis and Enuresis, and there are no established criteria for an "Other Specified Elimination Disorder" within the manual.

Other Specified Elimination Disorder (OSED) was created as a diagnostic category in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5-TR) for several reasons related to the clinical assessment and management of elimination disorders in children.

Heterogeneity of Presentation: Elimination disorders encompass a wide range of symptoms and presentations, including urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, encopresis (fecal soiling), and enuresis (bedwetting). The clinical presentation of these disorders can vary significantly among children and may not always fit the criteria for a specific established diagnosis. OSED was introduced to account for this heterogeneity and provide a diagnostic option for cases that do not neatly fit into existing categories.

Improved Clinical Recognition: The creation of OSED aims to improve the recognition and diagnosis of elimination disorders that might otherwise go unaddressed or be misdiagnosed. By acknowledging the presence of these disorders under a specific diagnostic category, clinicians are more likely to assess and address elimination problems in children, leading to better treatment and outcomes.

Tailored Interventions: OSED allows for a more tailored approach to intervention and treatment planning. Since elimination disorders can have diverse underlying causes and presentations, having a specific diagnostic category like OSED can guide clinicians in selecting appropriate interventions that match the individual needs of the child. This can lead to more effective treatment strategies.

Research and Clinical Documentation: OSED provides a structured framework for documenting and studying cases of elimination disorders that do not fit into existing categories. This contributes to the accumulation of clinical and research data, which may eventually lead to a better understanding of the underlying causes and more refined diagnostic criteria for elimination disorders in the future.

Other Specified Elimination Disorder was created to address the clinical complexities and heterogeneity observed in children with elimination disorders. It serves as a valuable diagnostic category that facilitates recognition, assessment, and treatment of these disorders while also promoting research efforts to further our understanding of this area of child psychopathology.

Clinical assessment and obtaining a comprehensive medical history are crucial steps in diagnosing and evaluating OSED. Here's how these assessments are typically conducted:

• Initial Interview: The process often begins with an initial interview with the child and their parents or caregivers. During this interview, the clinician gathers information about the child's medical and developmental history, family history, and current symptoms. They may ask questions about the child's toilet training history, toilet habits, and any stressful or traumatic events that may have occurred.
• Physical Examination: A physical examination is usually performed to assess the child's general health and to check for any physical conditions that may be contributing to Encopresis. This examination may include assessing the child's abdomen for signs of abdominal distension or tenderness, as well as a digital rectal examination to evaluate the rectal tone and the presence of impacted stool.
• Medical History: Obtaining a detailed medical history is essential. The clinician may inquire about the child's bowel habits, including the frequency, consistency, and timing of bowel movements. They may also ask about the presence of pain or discomfort during bowel movements, changes in diet or fluid intake, and any history of constipation or diarrhea.
• Stool Diary: Keeping a stool diary can be beneficial in tracking the child's bowel movements over a specific period. This diary may include information on the date and time of bowel movements, stool consistency, and any associated symptoms such as pain or urgency.
• Psychological Assessment: Since Encopresis often has psychological components, the clinician may assess the child's emotional and psychological well-being. They may ask about the child's feelings and reactions to soiling episodes, any social or emotional stressors, and the child's overall emotional state.
• Family and Social History: Understanding the family dynamics and any stressors within the family can be important. Clinicians may inquire about family relationships, changes in the child's life (e.g., school changes, family moves), and any significant life events or traumas.
• Medical Tests: In some cases, medical tests such as X-rays or abdominal ultrasounds may be ordered to assess the extent of fecal retention and impaction. These tests can help identify the presence of a physical blockage in the colon or rectum.
• Behavioral Assessment: Behavioral assessments may also be conducted to understand the child's toileting behavior, any fears or aversions related to using the toilet, and any associated behavioral issues that may need to be addressed in treatment.

The combination of clinical assessment, medical history, physical examination, and relevant tests helps clinicians diagnose Encopresis and determine its severity. It also assists in developing an appropriate treatment plan, which often includes medical interventions, dietary modifications, behavioral therapy, and addressing any underlying psychological factors. Collaboration between healthcare providers, pediatricians, gastroenterologists, and mental health professionals is often necessary to provide comprehensive care for children with Encopresis.

Summary

The category of "Other Specified Elimination Disorder" in the DSM-5-TR reflects the challenging nature of diagnosing and understanding disorders that do not fit neatly into specific diagnostic criteria. Historically, individuals with atypical presentations of elimination disorders may have been misunderstood or misdiagnosed, potentially leading to ineffective or stigmatizing interventions. However, over time, perspectives on these disorders have evolved to become more inclusive and compassionate.

Research studies have played a crucial role in expanding our understanding of the diverse ways in which elimination disorders can manifest. By recognizing and categorizing "Other Specified Elimination Disorders," clinicians and researchers acknowledge the complexity of these conditions and the need for tailored assessments and interventions. This inclusive approach underscores the importance of individualized care that considers the unique circumstances and challenges faced by each person.

Relationship disruption is a potential consequence of elimination disorders, including those that fall under the "Other Specified" category. The shame and distress associated with these conditions can strain familial and social relationships. Affected individuals may withdraw from social activities, impacting their ability to form and maintain connections with others. Furthermore, the challenges related to daily functioning, such as managing symptoms discreetly, can affect self-esteem and confidence, potentially leading to long-term consequences for identity and emotional well-being.

In conclusion, "Other Specified Elimination Disorders" represent a recognition of the diverse presentations within this diagnostic class. The evolving perspective on these disorders reflects a more compassionate and inclusive approach to diagnosis and treatment. Research studies have contributed to this shift by shedding light on the nuanced experiences of individuals with atypical elimination disorders, emphasizing the importance of tailored care and support.

References

Borowitz, S. M., Cox, D. J., & Tam, A. (2005). RCT of biofeedback, cognitive-behavioral training, and education for parents in pediatric functional constipation. Gastroenterology, 128(4), 825-832.

Joinson, C., Heron, J., & Butler, R. (2006). Psychological problems in children with fecal soiling. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 91(5), 394-397.

Loening-Baucke, V. (2004). Encopresis. The Journal of Pediatrics, 144(3), 362-367.

Piazza, C. C., Patel, M. R., & Santana, C. M. (2002). Reliability of the encopresis assessment questionnaire: A measure of bowel and bladder control. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35(3), 285-288.

Rajindrajith, S., Devanarayana, N. M., & Crispus Perera, B. J. (2016). Fecal incontinence in adolescents is associated with child abuse, somatization, and poor health-related quality of life. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 63(2), 206-211.

Rasquin, A., Di Lorenzo, C., Forbes, D., Guiraldes, E., Hyams, J. S., Staiano, A., & Walker, L. S. (2006). Childhood functional gastrointestinal disorders: Child/adolescent. Gastroenterology, 130(5), 1527-1537.

Taft, C., Cooper, P., & Dunkel, J. (2015). Family functioning, parenting stress, and quality of life in mothers and fathers of children with fecal incontinence. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 40(6), 586-594.

Ternar, R. S., Cepin-Bogovic, J., & Kocevar, H. (2018). Direct medical costs of pediatric patients with functional constipation and fecal incontinence: A comparison between public insurance with fee-for-service and managed care. European Journal of Pediatrics, 177(4), 591-600.

van den Berg, M. M., Benninga, M. A., Di Lorenzo, C., & Broekaert, I. (2006). Prevalence of pediatric functional gastrointestinal disorders utilizing the Rome III criteria. The Journal of Pediatrics, 149(5), 680-684.

von Gontard, A., Heron, J., Joinson, C., & Team, A. S. (2010). Family history of enuresis and encopresis in a nationally representative sample. Journal of Urology, 184(4), 1756-1760.